Cited by 1,044Relativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsQuantum and Classical Electrodynamics

Nonuniqueness of canonical field quantization in Riemannian space-time

Fulling, Stephen A.·1973·Physical Review D

Abstract

We point out and discuss an ambiguity which arises in the quantum theory of fields when the background metric is not explicitly Minkowskian-in other words, when an external gravitational field, real or apparent, is present. A general theory of a canonical neutral scalar field in a static universe, including the construction of a Fock space, is presented. It is applied to a portion of two-dimensional flat space-time equipped with a non-Cartesian space-time coordinate system with respect to which the metric is nonetheless static. The resulting particle interpretation of the field is shown to be different from the standard one in special-relativistic free-field theory. The ambiguity frustrates an attempt to define uniquely the energy-momentum tensor by the usual method of normal ordering. We discuss various suggestions for (1) distinguishing a unique correct quantization in a given physical situation, or (2) reinterpreting seemingly inequivalent theories as physically equivalent. In passing it is shown that the vacuum state and the energy density of a free field in a box with periodic boundary conditions differ from those associated with a region of the same size in infinite space; this result should be of interest outside the gravitational context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.7.2850

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to the Fulling-Davies-Unruh effect, accelerated observers in a vacuum observe a thermal radiation bath of real particles in the flat spacetime around them, with the particles originating from the quantum-field-theory vacuum itself.

    “According to the Fulling-Davies-Unruh effect (Fulling, 1973; Davies, 1975; Unruh, 1976), accelerated observers in a vacuum observe a thermal radiation bath of real particles in the flat spacetime around them, with the particles originating from the quantumfield-theory vacuum itself.”

    From A strictly local solution to the problem of energy in general relativity (2026) · cites this paper as Fulling, 1973

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fulling, S. A.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Corresponding author
Fulling, Stephen A.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1973-05-15
Volume
7
Issue
10
Pages
2850-2862
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079890182
Cited by
1,044
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 18
FWCI
10.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
Keywords
Riemannian space-time, static universe, neutral scalar field, Fock space, energy-momentum tensor, normal ordering, vacuum state, energy density, periodic boundary conditions, external gravitational field

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review