The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantum Field - Theory Models in Less Than 4 Dimensions
Abstract
The scalar ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{0}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}^{4}$ interaction and the Fermi interaction ${G}_{0}{(\overline{\ensuremath{\psi}}\ensuremath{\psi})}^{2}$ are studied for space-time dimension $d$ between 2 and 4. An unconventional coupling-constant renormalization is used: ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{0}={u}_{0}{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}^{\ensuremath{\epsilon}}$ ($\ensuremath{\epsilon}=4\ensuremath{-}d$) and ${G}_{0}={g}_{0}{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}^{2\ensuremath{-}d}$, with ${u}_{0}$ and ${g}_{0}$ held fixed as the cutoff $\ensuremath{\Lambda}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$. The theories can be solved in two limits: (1) the limit $N\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$ where $\ensuremath{\varphi}$ and $\ensuremath{\psi}$ are fields with $N$ components, and (2) the limit of small $\ensuremath{\epsilon}$, as a power series in $\ensuremath{\epsilon}$. Both theories exhibit scale invariance with anomalous dimensions in the zero-mass limit. For small $\ensuremath{\epsilon}$, the fields $\ensuremath{\varphi}$, ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}^{2}$, and $\ensuremath{\varphi}{\ensuremath{\nabla}}_{{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{1}}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}{\ensuremath{\nabla}}_{{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{n}}\ensuremath{\varphi}$ all have anomalous dimensions, except for the stress-energy tensor. These anomalous dimensions are calculated through order ${\ensuremath{\epsilon}}^{2}$; they are remarkably close to canonical except for ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}^{2}$. The ${(\overline{\ensuremath{\psi}}\ensuremath{\psi})}^{2}$ interaction is studied only for large $N$; for small $\ensuremath{\epsilon}$ it generates a weakly interacting composite boson. Both the ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}^{4}$ and ${(\overline{\ensuremath{\psi}}\ensuremath{\psi})}^{2}$ theories as solved here reduce to trivial free-field theories for $\ensuremath{\epsilon}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$. This paper is motivated by previous work in classical statistical mechanics by Stanley (the $N\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$ limit) and by Fisher and Wilson (the $\ensuremath{\epsilon}$ expansion).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Asymptotic Safety Scenario in Quantum Gravity
Niedermaier, M., & Reuter, M. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-5 · Cited by 733
Einstein gravity as a symmetry-breaking effect in quantum field theory
Adler, S. L. (1982) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.54.729 · Cited by 699
Spontaneous breakdown of continuous symmetries near two dimensions
Brézin, E., & Zinn-Justin, J. (1976) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.14.3110 · Cited by 599
Spontaneous symmetry breaking in theO(N)model for largeN
Coleman, S., Jackiw, R., & Politzer, H. D. (1974) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.10.2491 · Cited by 469
LargeNlimits as classical mechanics
Yaffe, L. G. (1982) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.54.407 · Cited by 465
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, K. G.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1973-05-15
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2911-2926
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097988810
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum Field - Theory Models in Less Than 4 Dimensions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.7.2911
- The paper
- Wilson, K. G. (1973). Quantum Field - Theory Models in Less Than 4 Dimensions. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.7.2911
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.