The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phenomenology of the littlest Higgs model withT-parity
Open accessAbstract
Little Higgs models offer an interesting approach to weakly coupled electroweak symmetry breaking without fine-tuning. The original little Higgs models were plagued by strong constraints from electroweak precision data which required a fine-tuning to be reintroduced. An economical solution to this problem is to introduce a discrete symmetry (analogous to $R$-parity of SUSY) called $T$-parity. $T$-parity not only eliminates most constraints from electroweak precision data, but it also leads to a promising dark matter candidate. In this paper we investigate the dark matter candidate in the littlest Higgs model with $T$-parity. An upper bound on the symmetry breaking scale $f\ensuremath{\lesssim}1.8\text{ }\mathrm{T}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{V}$ naturally arises from calculating the relic density. We begin the study of the LHC phenomenology of the littlest Higgs model with $T$-parity. We find that the model offers an interesting collider signature that has a generic missing energy signal which could ``fake'' SUSY at the LHC. We also investigate the properties of the heavy partner of the top quark which is common to all littlest Higgs models, and how its properties are modified with the introduction of $T$-parity. We include an appendix with a list of Feynman rules specific to the littlest Higgs with $T$-parity to facilitate further study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
Cited by
Jegerlehner, F., & Nyffeler, A. (2009) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.04.003 · Cited by 1,103
General-purpose event generators for LHC physics
Buckley, A., Butterworth, J., Gieseke, S., Grellscheid, D., Höche, S., Hoeth, H., Krauss, F., Lönnblad, L., Nurse, E., Richardson, P., et al. (2011) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2011.03.005 · Cited by 488
Flavor physics of leptons and dipole moments
Raidal, M., van der Schaaf, A., Bigi, I., Mangano, M. L., Semertzidis, Y., Abel, S., Albino, S., Antusch, S., Arganda, E., Bajc, B., et al. (2008) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0715-2 · Cited by 368
Bellazzini, B., Csáki, C., & Serra, J. (2014) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2766-x · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Hubisz, J., & Meade, P.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-02-28
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2131178112
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.