The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Status of inelastic dark matter
Open accessAbstract
In light of recent positive results from the DAMA experiment, as well as new null results from CDMS Soudan, Edelweiss, ZEPLIN-I and CRESST, we reexamine the framework of inelastic dark matter with a standard halo. In this framework, which was originally introduced to reconcile tensions between CDMS and DAMA, dark matter particles can scatter off of nuclei only by making a transition to a nearly degenerate state that is roughly $100\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{keV}$ heavier. We find that recent data significantly constrains the parameter space of the framework, but that there are still regions consistent with all experimental results. Because of the enhanced annual modulation and dramatically different energy dependence in this scenario, we emphasize the need for greater information on the dates of data taking, and on the energy distribution of signal and background. We also study the specific case of ``mixed-sneutrino'' dark matter, and isolate regions of parameter space which are cosmologically interesting for that particular model. A significant improvement in limits by heavy target experiments such as ZEPLIN or CRESST should be able to confirm or exclude the inelastic dark matter scenario in the near future. Within the mixed-sneutrino model, an elastic scattering signature should be seen at upcoming germanium experiments, including future results from CDMS Soudan.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
Cited by
Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints
Bertone, G., Hooper, D., & Silk, J. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031 · Cited by 4,979
Bernabei, R., Belli, P., Cappella, F., Cerulli, R., Dai, C. J., d’Angelo, A., He, H. L., Incicchitti, A., Kuang, H. H., Ma, X. H., et al. (2010) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1303-9 · Cited by 817
Final model independent result of DAMA/LIBRA–phase1
Bernabei, R., Belli, P., Cappella, F., Caracciolo, V., Castellano, S., Cerulli, R., Dai, C. J., d’Angelo, A., d’Angelo, S., Di Marco, A., et al. (2013) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2648-7 · Cited by 538
CMB constraints on WIMP annihilation: Energy absorption during the recombination epoch
Slatyer, T. R., Padmanabhan, N., & Finkbeiner, D. P. (2009) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.043526 · Cited by 472
Bernabei, R., Belli, P., Bussolotti, A., Cappella, F., Cerulli, R., Dai, C. J., d’Angelo, A., He, H. L., Incicchitti, A., Kuang, H. H., et al. (2008) · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment · doi:10.1016/j.nima.2008.04.082 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Tucker-Smith, D., & Weiner, N.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-09-14
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W61345581
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Status of inelastic dark matter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.72.063509
- The paper
- Tucker-Smith, D., & Weiner, N. (2005). Status of inelastic dark matter. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.72.063509
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.