Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 346

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The power of general relativity

Open access
Clifton, Timothy, Barrow, John D.·2005·Physical Review D

Abstract

We study the cosmological and weak-field properties of theories of gravity derived by extending general relativity by means of a Lagrangian proportional to ${R}^{1+\ensuremath{\delta}}$. This scale-free extension reduces to general relativity when $\ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$. In order to constrain generalizations of general relativity of this power class, we analyze the behavior of the perfect-fluid Friedmann universes and isolate the physically relevant models of zero curvature. A stable matter-dominated period of evolution requires $\ensuremath{\delta}>0$ or $\ensuremath{\delta}<\ensuremath{-}1/4$. The stable attractors of the evolution are found. By considering the synthesis of light elements (helium-4, deuterium and lithium-7) we obtain the bound $\ensuremath{-}0.017<\ensuremath{\delta}<0.0012$. We evaluate the effect on the power spectrum of clustering via the shift in the epoch of matter-radiation equality. The horizon size at matter-radiation equality will be shifted by $\ensuremath{\sim}1%$ for a value of $\ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\sim}0.0005$. We study the stable extensions of the Schwarzschild solution in these theories and calculate the timelike and null geodesics. No significant bounds arise from null geodesic effects but the perihelion precession observations lead to the strong bound $\ensuremath{\delta}=2.7\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}4.5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}19}$ assuming that Mercury follows a timelike geodesic. The combination of these observational constraints leads to the overall bound $0\ensuremath{\le}\ensuremath{\delta}<7.2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}19}$ on theories of this type.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.72.103005

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 346

Metadata

Authors
Clifton, T., & Barrow, J. D.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2005-11-23
Volume
72
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W2120914587
Cited by
346
References
34
FWCI
15.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The power of general relativity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.72.103005
The paper
Clifton, T., & Barrow, J. D. (2005). The power of general relativity. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.72.103005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.