The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cosmology off(R)gravity in the metric variational approach
Open accessAbstract
We consider the cosmologies that arise in a subclass of $f(R)$ gravity with $f(R)=R+{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{2n+2}/(\ensuremath{-}R{)}^{n}$ and $n\ensuremath{\in}(\ensuremath{-}1,0)$ in the metric (as opposed to the Palatini) variational approach to deriving the gravitational field equations. The calculations of the isotropic and homogeneous cosmological models are undertaken in the Jordan frame and at both the background and the perturbation levels. For the former, we also discuss the connection to the Einstein frame in which the extra degree of freedom in the theory is associated with a scalar field sharing some of the properties of a ``chameleon'' field. For the latter, we derive the cosmological perturbation equations in general theories of $f(R)$ gravity in covariant form and implement them numerically to calculate the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature and matter power spectra of the cosmological model. The CMB power is shown to reduce at low $l$'s, and the matter power spectrum is almost scale independent at small scales, thus having a similar shape to that in standard general relativity. These are in stark contrast with what was found in the Palatini $f(R)$ gravity, where the CMB power is largely amplified at low $l$'s and the matter spectrum is strongly scale dependent at small scales. These features make the present model more adaptable than that arising from the Palatini $f(R)$ field equations, and none of the data on background evolution, CMB power spectrum, or matter power spectrum currently rule it out.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MODIFIED GRAVITATIONAL THEORIES AND COSMIC ACCELERATION
EASSON, D. A. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x04022578 · Cited by 124
Cited by
Sotiriou, T. P., & Faraoni, V. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.451 · Cited by 4,519
Capozziello, S., & De Laurentis, M. (2011) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2011.09.003 · Cited by 3,321
Modified gravity theories on a nutshell: Inflation, bounce and late-time evolution
Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S. D., & Oikonomou, V. K. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.06.001 · Cited by 2,734
Beyond the cosmological standard model
Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., & Trodden, M. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002 · Cited by 1,231
Extended theories of gravity and their cosmological and astrophysical applications
Capozziello, S., & Francaviglia, M. (2008) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-007-0551-y · Cited by 874
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, B., & Barrow, J. D.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2007-04-05
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W1556419317
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.