Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 415

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inspiral, merger, and ringdown of unequal mass black hole binaries: A multipolar analysis

Open access
Berti, Emanuele, Cardoso, Vitor, Gonzalez, José A., Sperhake, Ulrich, Hannam, Mark, Husa, Sascha, Brügmann, Bernd·2007·Physical Review D

Abstract

We study the inspiral, merger, and ringdown of unequal mass black hole binaries by analyzing a catalogue of numerical simulations for seven different values of the mass ratio (from $q={M}_{2}/{M}_{1}=1$ to $q=4$). We compare numerical and post-Newtonian results by projecting the waveforms onto spin-weighted spherical harmonics, characterized by angular indices $(l,m)$. We find that the post-Newtonian equations predict remarkably well the relation between the wave amplitude and the orbital frequency for each $(l,m)$, and that the convergence of the post-Newtonian series to the numerical results is nonmonotonic. To leading order, the total energy emitted in the merger phase scales like ${\ensuremath{\eta}}^{2}$ and the spin of the final black hole scales like $\ensuremath{\eta}$, where $\ensuremath{\eta}=q/(1+q{)}^{2}$ is the symmetric mass ratio. We study the multipolar distribution of the radiation, finding that odd-$l$ multipoles are suppressed in the equal mass limit. Higher multipoles carry a larger fraction of the total energy as $q$ increases. We introduce and compare three different definitions for the ringdown starting time. Applying linear-estimation methods (the so-called Prony methods) to the ringdown phase, we find resolution-dependent time variations in the fitted parameters of the final black hole. By cross correlating information from different multipoles, we show that ringdown fits can be used to obtain precise estimates of the mass and spin of the final black hole, which are in remarkable agreement with energy and angular momentum balance calculations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.76.064034

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 415

Metadata

Authors
Berti, E., Cardoso, V., Gonzalez, J. A., Sperhake, U., Hannam, M., Husa, S., & Brügmann, B.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2007-09-27
Volume
76
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W1967852555
Cited by
415
References
1
FWCI
22.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inspiral, merger, and ringdown of unequal mass black hole binaries: A multipolar analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.76.064034
The paper
Berti, E., Cardoso, V., Gonzalez, J. A., Sperhake, U., Hannam, M., Husa, S., & Brügmann, B. (2007). Inspiral, merger, and ringdown of unequal mass black hole binaries: A multipolar analysis. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.76.064034

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.