The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inspiral, merger, and ringdown of unequal mass black hole binaries: A multipolar analysis
Open accessAbstract
We study the inspiral, merger, and ringdown of unequal mass black hole binaries by analyzing a catalogue of numerical simulations for seven different values of the mass ratio (from $q={M}_{2}/{M}_{1}=1$ to $q=4$). We compare numerical and post-Newtonian results by projecting the waveforms onto spin-weighted spherical harmonics, characterized by angular indices $(l,m)$. We find that the post-Newtonian equations predict remarkably well the relation between the wave amplitude and the orbital frequency for each $(l,m)$, and that the convergence of the post-Newtonian series to the numerical results is nonmonotonic. To leading order, the total energy emitted in the merger phase scales like ${\ensuremath{\eta}}^{2}$ and the spin of the final black hole scales like $\ensuremath{\eta}$, where $\ensuremath{\eta}=q/(1+q{)}^{2}$ is the symmetric mass ratio. We study the multipolar distribution of the radiation, finding that odd-$l$ multipoles are suppressed in the equal mass limit. Higher multipoles carry a larger fraction of the total energy as $q$ increases. We introduce and compare three different definitions for the ringdown starting time. Applying linear-estimation methods (the so-called Prony methods) to the ringdown phase, we find resolution-dependent time variations in the fitted parameters of the final black hole. By cross correlating information from different multipoles, we show that ringdown fits can be used to obtain precise estimates of the mass and spin of the final black hole, which are in remarkable agreement with energy and angular momentum balance calculations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters
Marquardt, D. W. (1963) · Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1137/0111030 · Cited by 30,728
Cited by
Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes
Berti, E., Cardoso, V., & Starinets, A. O. (2009) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/16/163001 · Cited by 2,095
Self-citationTests of General Relativity with GW150914
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M. R., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.221101 · Cited by 1,773
Self-citationQuasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory
Konoplya, R. A., & Zhidenko, A. (2011) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.793 · Cited by 1,532
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab3800 · Cited by 895
Self-citationPhysics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with Gravitational Waves
Sathyaprakash, B. S., & Schutz, B. F. (2009) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2009-2 · Cited by 874
Metadata
- Authors
- Berti, E., Cardoso, V., Gonzalez, J. A., Sperhake, U., Hannam, M., Husa, S., & Brügmann, B.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2007-09-27
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W1967852555
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inspiral, merger, and ringdown of unequal mass black hole binaries: A multipolar analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.76.064034
- The paper
- Berti, E., Cardoso, V., Gonzalez, J. A., Sperhake, U., Hannam, M., Husa, S., & Brügmann, B. (2007). Inspiral, merger, and ringdown of unequal mass black hole binaries: A multipolar analysis. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.76.064034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.