The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New PVLAS results and limits on magnetically induced optical rotation and ellipticity in vacuum
Open accessAbstract
In 2006 the PVLAS collaboration reported the observation of an optical rotation generated in vacuum by a magnetic field. To further check against possible instrumental artifacts, several upgrades to the PVLAS apparatus have been made during the past year. Two data taking runs, at the wavelength of 1064 nm, have been performed in the new configuration with magnetic field strengths of 2.3 and 5 T. The 2.3 T field value was chosen in order to avoid stray fields. The new observations do not show the presence of a rotation signal down to the levels of $1.2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}8}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{rad}$ at 5 T and $1.0\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}8}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{rad}$ at 2.3 T (at 95% C.L.) with 45 000 passes in the magnetic field zone. In the same conditions no ellipticity signal was detected down to $1.4\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}8}$ at 2.3 T (at 95% C.L.), whereas at 5 T a signal is still present. The physical nature of this ellipticity as due to an effect depending on ${B}^{2}$ can be excluded by the measurement at 2.3 T. These new results completely exclude the previously published magnetically induced vacuum dichroism results, indicating that they were instrumental artifacts. These new results therefore also exclude the particle interpretation of the previous PVLAS results as due to a spin-zero boson. The background ellipticity at 2.3 T can be used to determine a new limit on the total photon-photon scattering cross section of ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\gamma}}<4.5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}34}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{barn}$ at 95% C.L.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization
Schwinger, J. (1951) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.82.664 · Cited by 7,116
Cited by
Axions and the strongCPproblem
Kim, J. E., & Carosi, G. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.557 · Cited by 916
New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles
Irastorza, I. G., & Redondo, J. (2018) · Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.05.003 · Cited by 745
Recent Advances in Wave Function-Based Methods of Molecular-Property Calculations
Helgaker, T., Coriani, S., Jørgensen, P., Kristensen, K., Olsen, J., & Ruud, K. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr2002239 · Cited by 694
Metadata
- Authors
- Zavattini, E., Zavattini, G., Ruoso, G., Raiteri, G., Polacco, E., Milotti, E., Lozza, V., Karuza, M., Gastaldi, U., Di Domenico, G., Della Valle, F., Cimino, R., Carusotto, S., Cantatore, G., & Bregant, M.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-02-29
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2112922831
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.