Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 432

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Template bank for gravitational waveforms from coalescing binary black holes: Nonspinning binaries

Open access
Ajith, P., Babak, S., Chen, Y., Hewitson, M., Krishnan, B., Sintes, A. M., Whelan, J. T., Brügmann, B., Diener, P., Dorband, N., Gonzalez, J., Hannam, M., Husa, S., Pollney, D., Rezzolla, L., Santamaría, L., Sperhake, U., Thornburg, J.·2008·Physical Review D

Abstract

Gravitational waveforms from the inspiral and ring-down stages of the binary black-hole coalescences can be modeled accurately by approximation/perturbation techniques in general relativity. Recent progress in numerical relativity has enabled us to model also the nonperturbative merger phase of the binary black-hole coalescence problem. This enables us to coherently search for all three stages of the coalescence of nonspinning binary black holes using a single template bank. Taking our motivation from these results, we propose a family of template waveforms which can model the inspiral, merger, and ring-down stages of the coalescence of nonspinning binary black holes that follow quasicircular inspiral. This two-dimensional template family is explicitly parametrized by the physical parameters of the binary. We show that the template family is not only effectual in detecting the signals from black-hole coalescences, but also faithful in estimating the parameters of the binary. We compare the sensitivity of a search (in the context of different ground-based interferometers) using all three stages of the black-hole coalescence with other template-based searches which look for individual stages separately. We find that the proposed search is significantly more sensitive than other template-based searches for a substantial mass range, potentially bringing about remarkable improvement in the event rate of ground-based interferometers. As part of this work, we also prescribe a general procedure to construct interpolated template banks using nonspinning black-hole waveforms produced by numerical relativity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.77.104017

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 432

Metadata

Authors
Ajith, P., Babak, S., Chen, Y., Hewitson, M., Krishnan, B., Sintes, A. M., Whelan, J. T., Brügmann, B., Diener, P., Dorband, N., Gonzalez, J., Hannam, M., Husa, S., Pollney, D., Rezzolla, L., Santamaría, L., Sperhake, U., & Thornburg, J.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2008-05-14
Volume
77
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W2110117754
Cited by
432
References
2
FWCI
20.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Template bank for gravitational waveforms from coalescing binary black holes: Nonspinning binaries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.77.104017
The paper
Ajith, P., Babak, S., Chen, Y., Hewitson, M., Krishnan, B., Sintes, A. M., Whelan, J. T., Brügmann, B., Diener, P., Dorband, N., Gonzalez, J., Hannam, M., Husa, S., Pollney, D., Rezzolla, L., Santamaría, L., Sperhake, U., & Thornburg, J. (2008). Template bank for gravitational waveforms from coalescing binary black holes: Nonspinning binaries. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.77.104017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.