Imprints of primordial non-Gaussianities on large-scale structure: Scale-dependent bias and abundance of virialized objects
Open accessAbstract
We study the effect of primordial non-Gaussianity on large-scale structure, focusing upon the most massive virialized objects. Using analytic arguments and $N$-body simulations, we calculate the mass function and clustering of dark matter halos across a range of redshifts and levels of non-Gaussianity. We propose a simple fitting function for the mass function valid across the entire range of our simulations. We find pronounced effects of non-Gaussianity on the clustering of dark matter halos, leading to strongly scale-dependent bias. This suggests that the large-scale clustering of rare objects may provide a sensitive probe of primordial non-Gaussianity. We very roughly estimate that upcoming surveys can constrain non-Gaussianity at the level of $|{f}_{\mathrm{NL}}|\ensuremath{\lesssim}10$, which is competitive with forecasted constraints from the microwave background.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Primordial non-Gaussianity is probed by the large-scale power of any biased tracer of matter overdensities.
“Primordial non-Gaussianity is also probed by the largescale power of any biased tracer of the matter overdensities ( Dalal et al. 2008 ) .”
From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as Dalal et al. 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 111 · Cited by 830
- Authors
- Dalal, N., Doré, O., Huterer, D., & Shirokov, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-06-11
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2042707894
- Cited by
- 830
- References
- 111
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 70
- FWCI
- 31.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of Chicago
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Keywords
- primordial non-Gaussianity, scale-dependent bias, dark matter halos, halo mass function, halo clustering, large-scale structure, N-body simulations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review