Cited by 830Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena

Imprints of primordial non-Gaussianities on large-scale structure: Scale-dependent bias and abundance of virialized objects

Open access
Dalal, Neal, Doré, Olivier, Huterer, Dragan, Shirokov, Alexander·2008·Physical Review D

Abstract

We study the effect of primordial non-Gaussianity on large-scale structure, focusing upon the most massive virialized objects. Using analytic arguments and $N$-body simulations, we calculate the mass function and clustering of dark matter halos across a range of redshifts and levels of non-Gaussianity. We propose a simple fitting function for the mass function valid across the entire range of our simulations. We find pronounced effects of non-Gaussianity on the clustering of dark matter halos, leading to strongly scale-dependent bias. This suggests that the large-scale clustering of rare objects may provide a sensitive probe of primordial non-Gaussianity. We very roughly estimate that upcoming surveys can constrain non-Gaussianity at the level of $|{f}_{\mathrm{NL}}|\ensuremath{\lesssim}10$, which is competitive with forecasted constraints from the microwave background.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.77.123514

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Primordial non-Gaussianity is probed by the large-scale power of any biased tracer of matter overdensities.

    “Primordial non-Gaussianity is also probed by the largescale power of any biased tracer of the matter overdensities ( Dalal et al. 2008 ) .”

    From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as Dalal et al. 2008

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 111 · Cited by 830

Authors
Dalal, N., Doré, O., Huterer, D., & Shirokov, A.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2008-06-11
Volume
77
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W2042707894
Cited by
830
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 70
FWCI
31.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of Chicago
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
primordial non-Gaussianity, scale-dependent bias, dark matter halos, halo mass function, halo clustering, large-scale structure, N-body simulations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review