The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CMB constraints on dark matter models with large annihilation cross section
Open accessAbstract
The injection of secondary particles produced by dark matter (DM) annihilation around redshift $\ensuremath{\sim}1000$ would inevitably affect the process of recombination, leaving an imprint on cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies and polarization. We show that the most recent CMB measurements provided by the WMAP satellite mission place interesting constraints on DM self-annihilation rates, especially for models that exhibit a large Sommerfeld enhancement of the annihilation cross section, as recently proposed to fit the PAMELA and ATIC results. Furthermore, we argue that upcoming CMB experiments such as Planck, will improve the constraints by at least 1 order of magnitude, thus providing a sensitive probe of the properties of DM particles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309179 · Cited by 4,920
Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: A Monte Carlo approach
Lewis, A., & Bridle, S. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.103511 · Cited by 3,495
Cited by
Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartlett, J. G., et al. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.01589 · Cited by 10,720
Self-citationPlanck 2015 results: XIII. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartlett, J. G., et al. (2016) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 · Cited by 10,583
Self-citationBertone, G., & Hooper, D. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.045002 · Cited by 1,241
Self-citationDark matter self-interactions and small scale structure
Tulin, S., & Yu, H.-B. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.11.004 · Cited by 1,111
Update on scalar singlet dark matter
Cline, J. M., Scott, P., Kainulainen, K., & Weniger, C. (2013) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.055025 · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Authors
- Galli, S., Iocco, F., Bertone, G., & Melchiorri, A.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2009-07-08
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2142290259
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CMB constraints on dark matter models with large annihilation cross section. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.80.023505
- The paper
- Galli, S., Iocco, F., Bertone, G., & Melchiorri, A. (2009). CMB constraints on dark matter models with large annihilation cross section. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.80.023505
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
