The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sommerfeld enhancements for thermal relic dark matter
Open accessAbstract
The annihilation cross section of thermal relic dark matter determines both its relic density and indirect detection signals. We determine how large indirect signals may be in scenarios with Sommerfeld-enhanced annihilation, subject to the constraint that the dark matter has the correct relic density. This work refines our previous analysis through detailed treatments of resonant Sommerfeld enhancement and the effect of Sommerfeld enhancement on freeze out. Sommerfeld enhancements raise many interesting issues in the freeze out calculation, and we find that the cutoff of resonant enhancement, the equilibration of force carriers, the temperature of kinetic decoupling, and the efficiency of self-interactions for preserving thermal velocity distributions all play a role. These effects may have striking consequences; for example, for resonantly-enhanced Sommerfeld annihilation, dark matter freezes out but may then chemically recouple, implying highly suppressed indirect signals, in contrast to naive expectations. In the minimal scenario with standard astrophysical assumptions, and tuning all parameters to maximize the signal, we find that, for force-carrier mass ${m}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}=250\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}$ and dark matter masses ${m}_{X}=0.1$, 0.3, and 1 TeV, the maximal Sommerfeld enhancement factors are ${S}_{\mathrm{eff}}=7$, 30, and 90, respectively. Such boosts are too small to explain both the PAMELA and Fermi excesses. Nonminimal models may require smaller boosts, but the bounds on ${S}_{\mathrm{eff}}$ could also be more stringent, and dedicated freeze out analyses are required. For concreteness, we focus on $4\ensuremath{\mu}$ final states, but we also discuss $4e$ and other modes, deviations from standard astrophysical assumptions and nonminimal particle physics models, and we outline the steps required to determine if such considerations may lead to a self-consistent explanation of the PAMELA or Fermi excesses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Two U(1)'s and ϵ charge shifts
Holdom, B. (1986) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91377-8 · Cited by 2,487
An anomalous positron abundance in cosmic rays with energies 1.5–100 GeV
Adriani, O., Barbarino, G. C., Bazilevskaya, G. A., Bellotti, R., Boezio, M., Bogomolov, E. A., Bonechi, L., Bongi, M., Bonvicini, V., Bottai, S., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07942 · Cited by 2,159
Arkani-Hamed, N., Finkbeiner, D. P., Slatyer, T. R., & Weiner, N. (2009) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.015014 · Cited by 1,651
Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis
Gondolo, P., & Gelmini, G. (1991) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90438-4 · Cited by 1,516
Constraint on the Photino Mass from Cosmology
Goldberg, H. (1983) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.50.1419 · Cited by 1,210
Pospelov, M., Ritz, A., & Voloshin, M. (2008) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.02.052 · Cited by 1,143
Measurement of the Cosmic Raye++e−Spectrum from 20 GeV to 1 TeV with the Fermi Large Area Telescope
Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., Atwood, W. B., Axelsson, M., Baldini, L., Ballet, J., Barbiellini, G., Bastieri, D., Battelino, M., et al. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.181101 · Cited by 904
Smith, D., & Weiner, N. (2001) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.64.043502 · Cited by 819
New fixed-target experiments to search for dark gauge forces
Bjorken, J. D., Essig, R., Schuster, P., & Toro, N. (2009) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.075018 · Cited by 806
Über die Beugung und Bremsung der Elektronen
SOMMERFELD, A. (1931) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19314030302 · Cited by 777
Cited by
Dark matter self-interactions and small scale structure
Tulin, S., & Yu, H.-B. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.11.004 · Cited by 1,111
Self-citationBeyond collisionless dark matter: Particle physics dynamics for dark matter halo structure
Tulin, S., Yu, H.-B., & Zurek, K. M. (2013) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.115007 · Cited by 516
Self-citationCore formation in dwarf haloes with self-interacting dark matter: no fine-tuning necessary
Elbert, O. D., Bullock, J. S., Garrison-Kimmel, S., Rocha, M., Oñorbe, J., & Peter, A. H. G. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1470 · Cited by 306
A stringent upper limit on dark matter self-interaction cross-section from cluster strong lensing
Andrade, K. E., Fuson, J., Gad-Nasr, S., Kong, D., Minor, Q., Roberts, M. G., & Kaplinghat, M. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3241 · Cited by 94
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Feng, J. L., Kaplinghat, M., & Yu, H.-B.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2010-10-26
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2098995349
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 11.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sommerfeld enhancements for thermal relic dark matter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.82.083525
- The paper
- Feng, J. L., Kaplinghat, M., & Yu, H.-B. (2010). Sommerfeld enhancements for thermal relic dark matter. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.82.083525
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.