The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Precise relic WIMP abundance and its impact on searches for dark matter annihilation
Open accessAbstract
If dark matter (DM) is a weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) that is a thermal relic of the early Universe, then its total self-annihilation cross section is revealed by its present-day mass density. This result for a generic WIMP is usually stated as $⟨\ensuremath{\sigma}v⟩\ensuremath{\approx}3\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}26}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{cm}}^{3}\text{ }{\mathrm{s}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$, with unspecified uncertainty, and taken to be independent of WIMP mass. Recent searches for annihilation products of DM annihilation have just reached the sensitivity to exclude this canonical cross section for 100% branching ratio to certain final states and small WIMP masses. The ultimate goal is to probe all kinematically allowed final states as a function of mass and, if all states are adequately excluded, set a lower limit to the WIMP mass. Probing the low-mass region is further motivated due to recent hints for a light WIMP in direct and indirect searches. We revisit the thermal relic abundance calculation for a generic WIMP and show that the required cross section can be calculated precisely. It varies significantly with mass at masses below 10 GeV, reaching a maximum of $5.2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}26}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{cm}}^{3}\text{ }{\mathrm{s}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ at $m\ensuremath{\approx}0.3\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$, and is $2.2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}26}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{cm}}^{3}\text{ }{\mathrm{s}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ with feeble mass dependence for masses above 10 GeV. These results, which differ significantly from the canonical value and have not been taken into account in searches for annihilation products from generic WIMPs, have a noticeable impact on the interpretation of present limits from Fermi-LAT and $\mathrm{WMAP}+\mathrm{ACT}$.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints
Bertone, G., Hooper, D., & Silk, J. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031 · Cited by 4,979
Cited by
Ackermann, M., Albert, A., Anderson, B., Atwood, W. B., Baldini, L., Barbiellini, G., Bastieri, D., Bechtol, K., Bellazzini, R., Bissaldi, E., et al. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.231301 · Cited by 1,116
Update on scalar singlet dark matter
Cline, J. M., Scott, P., Kainulainen, K., & Weniger, C. (2013) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.055025 · Cited by 580
Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., Albert, A., Anderson, B., Atwood, W. B., Baldini, L., Barbiellini, G., Bastieri, D., Bellazzini, R., Bissaldi, E., et al. (2015) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.122002 · Cited by 311
MAGIC collaboration (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/02/039 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Steigman, G., Dasgupta, B., & Beacom, J. F.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2012-07-03
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2114488751
- Cited by
- 743
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Precise relic WIMP abundance and its impact on searches for dark matter annihilation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.86.023506
- The paper
- Steigman, G., Dasgupta, B., & Beacom, J. F. (2012). Precise relic WIMP abundance and its impact on searches for dark matter annihilation. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.86.023506
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.