Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fluctuations and correlations of net baryon number, electric charge, and strangeness: A comparison of lattice QCD results with the hadron resonance gas model

Open access
Bazavov, A., Bhattacharya, Tanmoy, DeTar, C. E., Ding, H.-T., Gottlieb, Steven, Gupta, Rajan, Hegde, P., Heller, Urs M., Karsch, F., Laermann, E., Levkova, L., Mukherjee, Swagato, Petreczky, P., Schmidt, Christian, Soltz, R. A., Soeldner, W., Sugar, R., Vranas, Pavlos M., HotQCD Collaboration·2012·Physical Review D
DOI 10.1103/physrevd.86.034509
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We calculate the quadratic fluctuations of net baryon number, electric charge and strangeness as well as correlations among these conserved charges in ($2+1$)-flavor lattice QCD at zero chemical potential. Results are obtained using calculations with tree-level improved gauge and the highly improved staggered quark actions with almost physical light and strange quark masses at three different values of the lattice cutoff. Our choice of parameters corresponds to a value of 160 MeV for the lightest pseudoscalar Goldstone mass and a physical value of the kaon mass. The three diagonal charge susceptibilities and the correlations among conserved charges have been extrapolated to the continuum limit in the temperature interval $150\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}\ensuremath{\le}T\ensuremath{\le}250\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}$. We compare our results with the hadron resonance gas (HRG) model calculations and find agreement with HRG model results only for temperatures $T\ensuremath{\lesssim}150\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}$. We observe significant deviations in the temperature range $160\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}\ensuremath{\lesssim}T\ensuremath{\lesssim}170\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}$ and qualitative differences in the behavior of the three conserved charge sectors. At $T\ensuremath{\simeq}160\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}$ quadratic net baryon number fluctuations in QCD agree with HRG model calculations, while the net electric charge fluctuations in QCD are about 10% smaller and net strangeness fluctuations are about 20% larger. These findings are relevant to the discussion of freeze-out conditions in relativistic heavy ion collisions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.86.034509

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Bazavov, A., Bhattacharya, T., DeTar, C. E., Ding, H.-T., Gottlieb, S., Gupta, R., Hegde, P., Heller, U. M., Karsch, F., Laermann, E., Levkova, L., Mukherjee, S., Petreczky, P., Schmidt, C., Soltz, R. A., Soeldner, W., Sugar, R., Vranas, P. M., & HotQCD Collaboration
Venue
Physical Review D
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2012-08-31
Volume
86
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
DOI
10.1103/physrevd.86.034509
OpenAlex
W2078577897
Cited by
347
References
23
FWCI
13.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.