The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Erratum: Proof of the generalized second law for rapidly changing fields and arbitrary horizon slices [Phys. Rev. D 85 , 104049 (2012)]
Open accessAbstract
Received 26 February 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.069904© 2013 American Physical Society
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is impossible to fix the information problem by adding small corrections to the Hawking process by slightly modifying the Hamiltonian or state of the quantum fields near the horizon.
“In particular, it is impossible to fix the problem by adding small corrections to the Hawking process by slightly modifying the Hamiltonian or state of the quantum fields near the horizon [62-64].”
From The entropy of Hawking radiation (2021) · cites this paper as [62]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.28.2929 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The entropy of Hawking radiation
Almheiri, A., Hartman, T., Maldacena, J., Shaghoulian, E., & Tajdini, A. (2021) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.93.035002 · Cited by 706
Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy
Jafferis, D. L., Lewkowycz, A., Maldacena, J., & Suh, S. J. (2016) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep06(2016)004 · Cited by 539
Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy
Jafferis, D. L., Lewkowycz, A., Maldacena, J., & Suh, S. J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.06431 · Cited by 534
Jerusalem lectures on black holes and quantum information
Harlow, D. (2016) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.015002 · Cited by 480
Holographic proof of the quantum null energy condition
Koeller, J., & Leichenauer, S. (2016) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.024026 · Cited by 105
Jackiw-Teitelboim model coupled to conformal matter in the semi-classical limit
Moitra, U., Sake, S. K., Trivedi, S. P., & Vishal, V. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2020)199 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Wall, A. C.
- Corresponding author
- Wall, Aron C.
- ORCID
- Wall, Aron C.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2013-03-08
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2325940665
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- generalized second law, black hole thermodynamics, black hole entropy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review