The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Unambiguous determination of the neutrino mass hierarchy using reactor neutrinos
Open accessAbstract
Determination of the neutrino mass hierarchy in a reactor neutrino experiment at the medium baseline is discussed. Observation of the interference effects between the $\ensuremath{\Delta}{m}_{31}^{2}$ and $\ensuremath{\Delta}{m}_{32}^{2}$ oscillations enables a relative measurement independent of the knowledge of the absolute mass-squared difference. With a 20 kton liquid scintillator detector of the $3%/\sqrt{E\text{ }\text{ }(\mathrm{MeV})}$ energy resolution, the Daya Bay II experiment at a baseline of $\ensuremath{\sim}50\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{km}$ from reactors of total thermal power 36 GW can determine the mass hierarchy at a confidence level of $\ensuremath{\Delta}{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{MH}}^{2}\ensuremath{\sim}(10\textdiv{}12)$ ($3\textdiv{}3.5\ensuremath{\sigma}$) in six years after taking into account the real spatial distribution of reactor cores. We show that the unknown residual energy nonlinearity of the liquid scintillator detector has limited impact on the sensitivity due to the self-calibration of small oscillation peaks. Furthermore, an extra increase of $\ensuremath{\Delta}{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{MH}}^{2}\ensuremath{\simeq}4(9)$ can be obtained, by including the precise measurement of the effective mass-squared difference $\ensuremath{\Delta}{m}_{\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\mu}}^{2}$ of expected relative error 1.5% (1%) from ongoing long-baseline muon neutrino disappearance experiments. The sensitivities from the interference and from absolute measurements can be cross-checked. When combining these two, the mass hierarchy can be determined at a confidence level of $\ensuremath{\Delta}{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{MH}}^{2}\ensuremath{\sim}(15\textdiv{}20)$ ($4\ensuremath{\sigma}$) in six years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Alam, S., Aubert, M., Avila, S., Balland, C., Bautista, J. E., Bershady, M. A., Bizyaev, D., Blanton, M. R., Bolton, A. S., Bovy, J., et al. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.083533 · Cited by 1,337
Self-citationLetter of intent for KM3NeT 2.0
Adrián-Martínez, S., Ageron, M., Aharonian, F., Aiello, S., Albert, A., Ameli, F., Anassontzis, E., Andre, M., Androulakis, G., Anghinolfi, M., et al. (2016) · Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics · doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/8/084001 · Cited by 906
Flavor structures of charged fermions and massive neutrinos
Xing, Z.-Z. (2020) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.02.001 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Y.-F., Cao, J., Wang, Y., & Zhan, L.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2013-07-16
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W1998057278
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unambiguous determination of the neutrino mass hierarchy using reactor neutrinos. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.88.013008
- The paper
- Li, Y.-F., Cao, J., Wang, Y., & Zhan, L. (2013). Unambiguous determination of the neutrino mass hierarchy using reactor neutrinos. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.88.013008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.