Cited by 37Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesQuantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect

AdS black holes, the bulk-boundary dictionary, and smearing functions

Open access
Leichenauer, Stefan, Rosenhaus, Vladimir·2013·Physical Review D

Abstract

In Lorentzian AdS/CFT there exists a mapping between local bulk operators and nonlocal conformal field theory (CFT) operators. In global anti-de Sitter (AdS) this mapping can be found through use of bulk equations of motion and allows the nonlocal CFT operator to be expressed as a local operator smeared over a range of positions and times. We argue that such a construction is not possible if there are bulk normal modes with exponentially small near boundary imprint. We show that the AdS-Schwarzschild background is such a case, with the horizon introducing modes with angular momentum much larger than frequency, causing them to be trapped by the centrifugal barrier. More generally, we argue that any barrier in the radial effective potential which prevents null geodesics from reaching the boundary will lead to modes with vanishingly small near boundary imprint, thereby obstructing the existence of a smearing function. While one may have thought the bulk-boundary dictionary for low curvature regions, such as the exterior of a black hole, should be as in empty AdS, our results demonstrate otherwise.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.88.026003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The λ integral in (A.9) does not converge for any choice of bulk and boundary points.

    “using the WKB approximation for Y and ψ at large λ it is not hard to see that indeed the integral does not converge for any choice of bulk and boundary points [8, 51, 52].”

    From Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT (2015) · cites this paper as [51]

  • The expression for K is not well-defined.

    “It was immediately realized, however, that in fact this expression for K is not welldefined [7] (see also [51, 52])”

    From Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT (2015) · cites this paper as [51]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leichenauer, S., & Rosenhaus, V.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2013-07-08
Volume
88
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W2057621962
Cited by
37
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
Keywords
AdS/CFT correspondence, AdS black holes, smearing functions, null geodesics, centrifugal barrier, effective potential, horizon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review