The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Parametrization of gamma-ray production cross sections forppinteractions in a broad proton energy range from the kinematic threshold to PeV energies
Open accessAbstract
Using publicly available Monte Carlo codes as well as compilation of published data on $pp$ interactions for proton kinetic energy below 2 GeV, we parametrize the energy spectra and production rates of $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-rays by simple but quite accurate ($\ensuremath{\le}20%$) analytical expressions in a broad range from the kinematic threshold to PeV energies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At cosmic-ray proton energies ≲2 GeV, γ-ray production is primarily via resonant processes and through inverse Compton scattering of secondary leptonic particles.
“At this energy, the γ -ray production is primarily via resonant processes (Kafexhiu et al. 2014) and through IC scattering of the secondary leptonic particles (equation 14) not included in the above equation.”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Kafexhiu et al. 2014
Lower γ-ray production at cosmic-ray proton energies ≲2 GeV is expected due to the inefficiency of the inelastic collision as the proton energy reaches the rest mass energy of the proton.
“The lower γ -ray production at Ep ≲ 2 GeV is expected due to the inefficiency of the inelastic collision as Ep reaches the rest mass energy of the proton.”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Kafexhiu et al. 2014
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 104
- 10.1103/PhysRev.103.404 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.105.1874 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.88.1163 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.ns.04.120154.001251 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.73.127 · DOI
- 10.1143/ptp/5.4.570 · DOI
- 10.1143/ptp/6.3.428 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00596818 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02745507 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.111.1699 · DOI
- 10.1086/149489 · DOI
- F. W. Stecker, 1971, NASA [Spec. Publ.] SP
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.15.820 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00651256 · DOI
- 10.1088/0305-4616/9/2/015 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.1415 · DOI
- 10.1016/0550-3213(72)90551-2 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.094030 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.05.003 · DOI
- C. D. Dermer, 1986, Astron. Astrophys., 157, 223
- 10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0798-9 · DOI
- 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/02/007 · DOI
- 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/026 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2008.01.036 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01496594 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.1459 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.4244 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.014904 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.74.044902 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.46.5013 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.50.5710 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.094003 · DOI
- N. N. Kalmykov, 1993, Phys. At. Nucl., 56, 346
- 10.1016/S0920-5632(96)00846-8 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.014026 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2005.07.026 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.2775904 · DOI
- 10.1016/0010-4655(86)90163-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/0010-4655(92)90082-A · DOI
- 10.1086/303785 · DOI
- 10.1086/426935 · DOI
- 10.1086/505189 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.034018 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TNS.2006.869826 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.010001 · DOI
- 10.1209/0295-5075/101/21004 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.012001 · DOI
- 10.1016/0370-2693(95)00794-L · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.2846 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9474(92)90130-C · DOI
- 10.1016/S0375-9474(01)00800-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9474(82)90037-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9474(95)00191-3 · DOI
- 10.1140/epja/i2006-10133-6 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.50.15 · DOI
- 10.1140/epja/i2011-11159-3 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.133.B1017 · DOI
- 10.1140/epja/i2012-12074-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0375-9474(02)01187-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.physletb.2009.07.012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.physletb.2007.04.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.11.041 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.138.B670 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.125.2091 · DOI
- 10.1086/164391 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.physletb.2010.05.010 · DOI
- 10.1140/epja/i2012-12064-y · DOI
- 10.1140/epja/i2002-10164-y · DOI
- 10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00629-6 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.50.15 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9474(94)90913-X · DOI
- 10.1140/epja/i2003-10207-y · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.043004 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.100.242 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.142.1195 · DOI
- 10.1016/0550-3213(70)90511-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/0550-3213(76)90329-1 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.77.54 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.11.1203 · DOI
- 10.1086/190849 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.35.1678 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9474(89)90209-1 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.41.520 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.47.1225 · DOI
- 10.1016/0168-583X(96)00331-X · DOI
- 10.1016/S0168-583X(97)00121-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0168-583X(99)00479-6 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.nucl.52.050102.090645 · DOI
- 10.1086/191001 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02722234 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2009.03.004 · DOI
- 10.1088/0004-637X/789/2/136 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.255 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1284 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.47.231 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevC.53.1782 · DOI
- 10.1088/1742-6596/503/1/012015 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2011.05.002 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.092001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.07.065 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nima.2011.12.071 · DOI
- F. A. Aharonian, 2000, Astron. Astrophys., 362, 937
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.023015 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way
Sarkar, K. C. (2024) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-024-00152-1 · Cited by 34
Updated deterministic radiation transport for future deep space missions
Slaba, T. C., Wilson, J. W., Werneth, C. M., & Whitman, K. (2020) · Life Sciences in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2020.06.004 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Kafexhiu, E., Aharonian, F., Taylor, A. M., & Vila, G. S.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics (DE)
- Dublin Institute For Advanced Studies (IE)
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2014-12-29
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2093887493
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 5.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Conicet (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PIP 0078, PICT 2012-00278)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
- Keywords
- gamma-ray production cross sections, proton-proton collisions, parameterization, closed-form expressions, energy spectrum, production rate, kinematic threshold, cosmic rays, gamma-ray astronomy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
