The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mass-radius relation for neutron stars inf(R)gravity
Open accessAbstract
We discuss the mass-radius diagram for static neutron star models obtained by the numerical solution of modified Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations in $f(R)$ gravity where the Lagrangians $f(R)=R+\ensuremath{\alpha}{R}^{2}(1+\ensuremath{\gamma}R)$ and $f(R)={R}^{1+\ensuremath{\epsilon}}$ are adopted. Unlike the case of the perturbative approach previously reported, the solutions are constrained by the presence of an extra degree of freedom, coming from the trace of the field equations. In particular, the stiffness of the equation of state determines an upper limit on the central density ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{\mathrm{c}}$ above which the positivity condition of energy-matter tensor trace ${T}^{\mathrm{m}}=\ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{-}3p$ holds. In the case of quadratic $f(R)$ gravity, we find higher masses and radii at lower central densities with an inversion of the behavior around a pivoting ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{c}$ which depends on the choice of the equation of state. When considering the cubic corrections, we find solutions converging to the required asymptotic behavior of the flat metric only for $\ensuremath{\gamma}<0$. A similar analysis is performed for $f(R)={R}^{1+\ensuremath{\epsilon}}$ considering $\ensuremath{\epsilon}$ as the leading parameter. We work strictly in the Jordan frame in order to consider matter minimally coupled with respect to geometry. This fact allows us to avoid ambiguities that could emerge in adopting the Einstein frame.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Fields in Curved Space
Birrell, N. D., & Davies, P. C. W. (1982) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622632 · Cited by 8,354
Cited by
Modified gravity theories on a nutshell: Inflation, bounce and late-time evolution
Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S. D., & Oikonomou, V. K. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.06.001 · Cited by 2,734
Self-citationStellar structure models in modified theories of gravity: Lessons and challenges
Olmo, G. J., Rubiera-Garcia, D., & Wojnar, A. (2020) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.07.001 · Cited by 253
Nonsymmetric wormholes and localized big rip singularities in Einstein-Weyl gravity
Bonanno, A., Silveravalle, S., & Zuccotti, A. (2022) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.124059 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Capozziello, S., De Laurentis, M., Farinelli, R., & Odintsov, S. D.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2016-01-06
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
- 2470-0029
- OpenAlex
- W2177396138
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.