The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cosmology from cosmic shear with Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
Open accessAbstract
We present the first constraints on cosmology from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), using weak lensing measurements from the preliminary Science Verification (SV) data. We use 139 square degrees of SV data, which is less than 3% of the full DES survey area. Using cosmic shear 2-point measurements over three redshift bins we find ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{8}({\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}}_{\mathrm{m}}/0.3{)}^{0.5}=0.81\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.06$ (68% confidence), after marginalizing over 7 systematics parameters and 3 other cosmological parameters. We examine the robustness of our results to the choice of data vector and systematics assumed, and find them to be stable. About 20% of our error bar comes from marginalizing over shear and photometric redshift calibration uncertainties. The current state-of-the-art cosmic shear measurements from CFHTLenS are mildly discrepant with the cosmological constraints from Planck CMB data; our results are consistent with both data sets. Our uncertainties are $\ensuremath{\sim}30%$ larger than those from CFHTLenS when we carry out a comparable analysis of the two data sets, which we attribute largely to the lower number density of our shear catalogue. We investigate constraints on dark energy and find that, with this small fraction of the full survey, the DES SV constraints make negligible impact on the Planck constraints. The moderate disagreement between the CFHTLenS and Planck values of ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{8}({\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}}_{\mathrm{m}}/0.3{)}^{0.5}$ is present regardless of the value of $w$.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartlett, J. G., et al. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.01589 · Cited by 10,720
Self-citationLewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309179 · Cited by 4,920
Beutler, F., Blake, C., Colless, M., Jones, D. H., Staveley-Smith, L., Campbell, L., Parker, Q., Saunders, W., & Watson, F. (2011) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19250.x · Cited by 2,590
The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample – I. A 4 per cent distance measure at z=0.15
Ross, A. J., Samushia, L., Howlett, C., Percival, W. J., Burden, A., & Manera, M. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv154 · Cited by 1,745
Bridle, S., & King, L. (2007) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/12/444 · Cited by 492
Self-citationUsing neural networks to estimate redshift distributions. An application to CFHTLenS
Bonnett, C. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv230 · Cited by 76
Self-citation
Cited by
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
Abbott, T. M. C., Abdalla, F. B., Alarcon, A., Aleksić, J., Allam, S., Allen, S., Amara, A., Annis, J., Asorey, J., Avila, S., et al. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.043526 · Cited by 1,213
Self-citationKiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing
Hildebrandt, H., Viola, M., Heymans, C., Joudaki, S., Kuijken, K., Blake, C., Erben, T., Joachimi, B., Klaes, D., Miller, L., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2805 · Cited by 1,021
The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy – an overview
(2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw641 · Cited by 1,019
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear
Troxel, M. A., MacCrann, N., Zuntz, J., Eifler, T. F., Krause, E., Dodelson, S., Gruen, D., Blazek, J., Friedrich, O., Samuroff, S., et al. (2018) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.043528 · Cited by 656
Self-citationEuclid: I. Overview of the Euclid mission
Euclid Collaboration, Mellier, Y., Abdurro’uf, Acevedo Barroso, J. A., Achúcarro, A., Adamek, J., Adam, R., Addison, G. E., Aghanim, N., Aguena, M., et al. (2025) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450810 · Cited by 616
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Abbott, T., Abdalla, F. B., Allam, S., Amara, A., Annis, J., Armstrong, R., Bacon, D., Banerji, M., Bauer, A. H., Baxter, E., Becker, M. R., Benoit-Lévy, A., Bernstein, R. A., Bernstein, G. M., Bertin, E., Blazek, J., Bonnett, C., Bridle, S. L., Brooks, D., Bruderer, C., Buckley-Geer, E., Burke, D. L., Busha, M. T., Capozzi, D., Carnero Rosell, A., Carrasco Kind, M., Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Chang, C., Clampitt, J., Crocce, M., Cunha, C. E., D’Andrea, C. B., da Costa, L. N., Das, R., DePoy, D. L., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J. P., Dodelson, S., Doel, P., Drlica-Wagner, A., Efstathiou, G., Eifler, T. F., Erickson, B., Estrada, J., Evrard, A. E., Fausti Neto, A., Fernandez, E., Finley, D. A., Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Frieman, J., Gangkofner, C., Garcia-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gutierrez, G., Hartley, W., Hirsch, M., Honscheid, K., Huff, E. M., Jain, B., James, D. J., Jarvis, M., Kacprzak, T., Kent, S., Kirk, D., Krause, E., Kravtsov, A., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Kwan, J., Lahav, O., Leistedt, B., Li, T. S., Lima, M., Lin, H., MacCrann, N., March, M., Marshall, J. L., Martini, P., McMahon, R. G., Melchior, P., Miller, C. J., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Neilsen, E., Nichol, R. C., Nicola, A., Nord, B., Ogando, R., Palmese, A., Peiris, H. V., Plazas, A. A., Refregier, A., Roe, N., Romer, A. K., Roodman, A., Rowe, B., Rykoff, E. S., Sabiu, C., Sadeh, I., Sako, M., Samuroff, S., Sanchez, E., Sánchez, C., Seo, H., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Smith, R. C., Soares-Santos, M., Sobreira, F., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thaler, J., Thomas, D., Troxel, M. A., Vikram, V., Walker, A. R., Wechsler, R. H., Weller, J., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., & The Dark Energy Survey Collaboration
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2016-07-06
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
- 2470-0029
- OpenAlex
- W996914278
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 20.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cosmology from cosmic shear with Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.94.022001
- The paper
- Abbott, T., Abdalla, F. B., Allam, S., Amara, A., Annis, J., Armstrong, R., Bacon, D., Banerji, M., Bauer, A. H., Baxter, E., Becker, M. R., Benoit-Lévy, A., Bernstein, R. A., Bernstein, G. M., Bertin, E., Blazek, J., Bonnett, C., Bridle, S. L., Brooks, D., . . . The Dark Energy Survey Collaboration. (2016). Cosmology from cosmic shear with Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.94.022001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
