The DOI matches its Crossref record; 213 of the 213 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unveiling ν secrets with cosmological data: Neutrino masses and mass hierarchy
Open accessAbstract
Using some of the latest cosmological data sets publicly available, we derive the strongest bounds in the literature on the sum of the three active neutrino masses, ${M}_{\ensuremath{\nu}}$, within the assumption of a background flat $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ cosmology. In the most conservative scheme, combining Planck cosmic microwave background temperature anisotropies and baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) data, as well as the up-to-date constraint on the optical depth to reionization ($\ensuremath{\tau}$), the tightest 95% confidence level upper bound we find is ${M}_{\ensuremath{\nu}}<0.151\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$. The addition of Planck high-$\ensuremath{\ell}$ polarization data, which, however, might still be contaminated by systematics, further tightens the bound to ${M}_{\ensuremath{\nu}}<0.118\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$. A proper model comparison treatment shows that the two aforementioned combinations disfavor the inverted hierarchy at $\ensuremath{\sim}64%\text{ }\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{C}.\mathrm{L}.$ and $\ensuremath{\sim}71%\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{C}.\mathrm{L}.$, respectively. In addition, we compare the constraining power of measurements of the full-shape galaxy power spectrum versus the BAO signature, from the BOSS survey. Even though the latest BOSS full-shape measurements cover a larger volume and benefit from smaller error bars compared to previous similar measurements, the analysis method commonly adopted results in their constraining power still being less powerful than that of the extracted BAO signal. Our work uses only cosmological data; imposing the constraint ${M}_{\ensuremath{\nu}}>0.06\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$ from oscillations data would raise the quoted upper bounds by $\mathcal{O}(0.1\ensuremath{\sigma})$ and would not affect our conclusions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Planck 2015 results: XIII. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartlett, J. G., et al. (2016) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 · Cited by 10,583
Self-citationPlanck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Armitage-Caplan, C., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Atrio-Barandela, F., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., et al. (2014) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321591 · Cited by 6,521
Self-citationGeneral methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations
Brooks, S. P., & Gelman, A. (1998) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.1998.10474787 · Cited by 6,045
NINE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE ( WMAP ) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETER RESULTS
Hinshaw, G., Larson, D., Komatsu, E., Spergel, D. N., Bennett, C. L., Dunkley, J., Nolta, M. R., Halpern, M., Hill, R. S., Odegard, N., et al. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19 · Cited by 5,121
Evidence for Oscillation of Atmospheric Neutrinos
Fukuda, Y., Hayakawa, T., Ichihara, E., Inoue, K., Ishihara, K., Ishino, H., Itow, Y., Kajita, T., Kameda, J., Kasuga, S., et al. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.1562 · Cited by 5,067
Lewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309179 · Cited by 4,920
Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: A Monte Carlo approach
Lewis, A., & Bridle, S. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.103511 · Cited by 3,495
Alam, S., Ata, M., Bailey, S., Beutler, F., Bizyaev, D., Blazek, J. A., Bolton, A. S., Brownstein, J. R., Burden, A., Chuang, C.-H., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx721 · Cited by 3,056
Self-citationAhmad, Q. R., Allen, R. C., Andersen, T. C., D.Anglin, J., Barton, J. C., Beier, E. W., Bercovitch, M., Bigu, J., Biller, S. D., Black, R. A., et al. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.011301 · Cited by 2,990
Beutler, F., Blake, C., Colless, M., Jones, D. H., Staveley-Smith, L., Campbell, L., Parker, Q., Saunders, W., & Watson, F. (2011) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19250.x · Cited by 2,590
Cited by
In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions *
Di Valentino, E., Mena, O., Pan, S., Visinelli, L., Yang, W., Melchiorri, A., Mota, D. F., Riess, A. G., & Silk, J. (2021) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d · Cited by 2,065
Self-citationBoyarsky, A., Drewes, M., Lasserre, T., Mertens, S., & Ruchayskiy, O. (2019) · Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.07.004 · Cited by 393
The galaxy power spectrum take on spatial curvature and cosmic concordance
Vagnozzi, S., Di Valentino, E., Gariazzo, S., Melchiorri, A., Mena, O., & Silk, J. (2021) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2021.100851 · Cited by 138
Self-citationCosmological dynamics of mimetic gravity
Dutta, J., Khyllep, W., Saridakis, E. N., Tamanini, N., & Vagnozzi, S. (2018) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/02/041 · Cited by 108
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vagnozzi, S., Giusarma, E., Mena, O., Freese, K., Gerbino, M., Ho, S., & Lattanzi, M.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2017-12-01
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
- 2470-0029
- OpenAlex
- W2584032561
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 213
- FWCI
- 26.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unveiling ν secrets with cosmological data: Neutrino masses and mass hierarchy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.96.123503
- The paper
- Vagnozzi, S., Giusarma, E., Mena, O., Freese, K., Gerbino, M., Ho, S., & Lattanzi, M. (2017). Unveiling ν secrets with cosmological data: Neutrino masses and mass hierarchy. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.96.123503
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
