CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 20

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Kerr-de Sitter spacetime, Penrose process, and the generalized area theorem

Bhattacharya, Sourav·2018·Physical Review D
DOI 10.1103/physrevd.97.084049
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.97.084049

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. R. M. Wald, 1986, General Relativity
  2. S. Chandrasekhar, 1985, The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes, 10.1119/1.13992 · DOI
  3. T. Padmanabhan, 2010, Gravitation: Foundation and Frontiers, 10.1017/CBO9780511807787 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0003-4916(74)90125-0 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.25.1596 · DOI
  6. 10.1086/152959 · DOI
  7. 10.1086/151796 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevD.4.3552 · DOI
  9. 10.1086/162952 · DOI
  10. 10.1086/163965 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.09.048 · DOI
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.024004 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.124056 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/JHEP06(2017)132 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.041101 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.064030 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.05.012 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.079 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.11.059 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.104045 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevD.64.104010 · DOI
  22. 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3902-6 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.141102 · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.064046 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/0375-9601(93)90111-C · DOI
  26. 10.1007/JHEP08(2010)131 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/JHEP08(2014)011 · DOI
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.044042 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.049904 · DOI
  30. R. Brito, 2015, Superradiance: Energy Extraction, Black-Hole Bombs and Implications for Astrophysics and Particle Physics, 10.1007/978-3-319-19000-6 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/BF03399503 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/j.geomphys.2004.05.001 · DOI
  33. 10.1088/0264-9381/28/8/085012 · DOI
  34. 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.084003 · DOI
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2738 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1088/0264-9381/13/10/013 · DOI
  37. 10.1103/PhysRevD.57.3503 · DOI
  38. 10.1023/A:1022318700787 · DOI
  39. 10.1088/0264-9381/26/10/105010 · DOI
  40. 10.1143/PTP.122.1239 · DOI
  41. 10.1143/PTP.122.1515 · DOI
  42. 10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2673-6 · DOI
  43. 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.104017 · DOI
  44. 10.1142/S0217732315400027 · DOI
  45. 10.1142/S0217732317500171 · DOI
  46. 10.3390/galaxies2010089 · DOI
  47. 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3052-7 · DOI
  48. 10.1088/0264-9381/33/24/245001 · DOI
  49. 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3955-6 · DOI
  50. 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.024038 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.10.058 · DOI
  52. 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.084030 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2017.04.013 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bhattacharya, S.
Venue
Physical Review D
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2018-04-26
Volume
97
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 2470-0010
  • 2470-0029
DOI
10.1103/physrevd.97.084049
Cited by
20
References
0
Language
en
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review