Cited by 65Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsHigh-Energy Particle Collisions ResearchParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies

Machine learning action parameters in lattice quantum chromodynamics

Open access
Shanahan, Phiala E., Trewartha, Daniel, Detmold, William·2018·Physical Review D

Abstract

Numerical lattice quantum chromodynamics studies of the strong interaction are important in many aspects of particle and nuclear physics. Such studies require significant computing resources to undertake. A number of proposed methods promise improved efficiency of lattice calculations, and access to regions of parameter space that are currently computationally intractable, via multi-scale action-matching approaches that necessitate parametric regression of generated lattice datasets. The applicability of machine learning to this regression task is investigated, with deep neural networks found to provide an efficient solution even in cases where approaches such as principal component analysis fail. The high information content and complex symmetries inherent in lattice QCD datasets require custom neural network layers to be introduced and present opportunities for further development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.97.094506

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shanahan, P. E., Trewartha, D., & Detmold, W.
Affiliations
  • William & Mary (US)
  • Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2018-05-16
Volume
97
Issue
9
ISSN
  • 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
  • 2470-0029
OpenAlex
W2783102654
Cited by
65
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 2
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D/Physical review. D. (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • W&M Publish (College of William & Mary) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Physical Review Letters
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0922770)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-SC0010495, DE-SC0011090, DE-SC0018121, DE-AC0506OR23177)
  • National Nuclear Security Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Keywords
machine learning, deep neural network, parametric regression, strong interaction, computational efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review