Machine learning action parameters in lattice quantum chromodynamics
Open accessAbstract
Numerical lattice quantum chromodynamics studies of the strong interaction are important in many aspects of particle and nuclear physics. Such studies require significant computing resources to undertake. A number of proposed methods promise improved efficiency of lattice calculations, and access to regions of parameter space that are currently computationally intractable, via multi-scale action-matching approaches that necessitate parametric regression of generated lattice datasets. The applicability of machine learning to this regression task is investigated, with deep neural networks found to provide an efficient solution even in cases where approaches such as principal component analysis fail. The high information content and complex symmetries inherent in lattice QCD datasets require custom neural network layers to be introduced and present opportunities for further development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ML offers a radically new approach that can potentially lead to discovery of new and more efficient algorithms.
“ML offers a radically new approach, which, in addition to the optimisation of existing algorithms (Shanahan, 2018), can potentially lead us towards the discovery of new and more efficient ones (Liu, 2017).”
From Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy (2021) · cites this paper as Shanahan, 2018
Cites
Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks
Carleo, G., & Troyer, M. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aag2302 · Cited by 2,215 · see citing works
Digital selection and analogue amplification coexist in a cortex-inspired silicon circuit
Hahnloser, R. H. R., Sarpeshkar, R., Mahowald, M. A., Douglas, R. J., & Seung, H. S. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35016072 · Cited by 1,293 · see citing works
The dropout learning algorithm
Baldi, P., & Sadowski, P. (2014) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2014.02.004 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002 · Cited by 4,611 · see citing works
“ML o ff ers a radically new approach, which, in addition to the optimisation of existing algorithms (Shanahan, Trewartha, & Detmold, 2018), can potentially lead us towards the discovery of new and more e ffi cient ones (Liu, Qi, Yang Meng, and Fu, 2017).”
Background
- Authors
- Shanahan, P. E., Trewartha, D., & Detmold, W.
- Affiliations
- William & Mary (US)
- Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2018-05-16
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 9
- ISSN
- 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
- 2470-0029
- OpenAlex
- W2783102654
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 5.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical review. D/Physical review. D. (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- W&M Publish (College of William & Mary) (submittedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Physical Review Letters
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0922770)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE-SC0010495, DE-SC0011090, DE-SC0018121, DE-AC0506OR23177)
- National Nuclear Security Administration
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- Keywords
- machine learning, deep neural network, parametric regression, strong interaction, computational efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review