The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Jamming transition as a paradigm to understand the loss landscape of deep neural networks
Open accessAbstract
Deep learning has been immensely successful at a variety of tasks, ranging from classification to artificial intelligence. Learning corresponds to fitting training data, which is implemented by descending a very high-dimensional loss function. Understanding under which conditions neural networks do not get stuck in poor minima of the loss, and how the landscape of that loss evolves as depth is increased, remains a challenge. Here we predict, and test empirically, an analogy between this landscape and the energy landscape of repulsive ellipses. We argue that in fully connected deep networks a phase transition delimits the over- and underparametrized regimes where fitting can or cannot be achieved. In the vicinity of this transition, properties of the curvature of the minima of the loss (the spectrum of the Hessian) are critical. This transition shares direct similarities with the jamming transition by which particles form a disordered solid as the density is increased, which also occurs in certain classes of computational optimization and learning problems such as the perceptron. Our analysis gives a simple explanation as to why poor minima of the loss cannot be encountered in the overparametrized regime. Interestingly, we observe that the ability of fully connected networks to fit random data is independent of their depth, an independence that appears to also hold for real data. We also study a quantity Δ which characterizes how well (Δ<0) or badly (Δ>0) a datum is learned. At the critical point it is power-law distributed on several decades, P_{+}(Δ)∼Δ^{θ} for Δ>0 and P_{-}(Δ)∼(-Δ)^{-γ} for Δ<0, with exponents that depend on the choice of activation function. This observation suggests that near the transition the loss landscape has a hierarchical structure and that the learning dynamics is prone to avalanche-like dynamics, with abrupt changes in the set of patterns that are learned.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior work (Advani and Saxe 2017; Geiger et al. 2019b, 2019a) points out that double descent is not observed when optimal early stopping is used.
“Advani and Saxe (2017), Geiger et al (2019b), (2019a) also point out that doubledescent is not observed when optimal early-stopping is used.”
From Deep double descent: where bigger models and more data hurt* (2021) · cites this paper as Geiger et al (2019b)
The Cross-entropy loss section says that users stop training at finite times and that doing so blurs critical behavior near jamming. The Conclusion discusses generalization as a topic for further study, but our copy does not say whether double descent disappears with optimal early stopping (searched: double descent, early stopping, optimal stopping). (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search
Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16961 · Cited by 15,612
Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge
Silver, D., Schrittwieser, J., Simonyan, K., Antonoglou, I., Huang, A., Guez, A., Hubert, T., Baker, L., Lai, M., Bolton, A., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24270 · Cited by 9,084
Spin Glass Theory and Beyond: An Introduction to the Replica Method and Its Applications
Mezard, M., Parisi, G., & Virasoro, M. (1986) · World Scientific Lecture Notes in Physics · doi:10.1142/0271 · Cited by 3,653
On the capabilities of multilayer perceptrons
Baum, E. B. (1988) · Journal of Complexity · doi:10.1016/0885-064x(88)90020-9 · Cited by 379
An Investigation into Neural Net Optimization via Hessian Eigenvalue Density
Ghorbani, B., Krishnan, S., & Xiao, Y. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.10159 · Cited by 144 · cited 1×
“[73] Behrooz Ghorbani, Shankar Krishnan, and Ying Xiao,”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 53
- A. Krizhevsky, 2012, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
- 10.1109/MSP.2012.2205597 · DOI · Paper page
- Y. LeCun, 1995, The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks
- K. He, 2016, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- S. Ioffe, 2015, Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning
- G. Montufar, 2014, Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems
- 10.1109/TNNLS.2013.2293637 · DOI
- M. Raghu, 2017, Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning
- R. Eldan, 2016, Proceedings of the Conference on Learning Theory
- H. Lee, 2017, Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Learning Theory
- 10.1088/0305-4470/21/1/030 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.2432 · DOI
- C. Zhang, 2017, Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.587 · DOI
- A. Choromanska, 2015, Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics
- C. D. Freeman, 2017, Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations
- E. Hoffer, 2017, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
- L. Sagun, 2017, Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations
- 10.1039/C7CP01108C · DOI
- Z. C. Lipton, 2016, Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations
- M. Baity-Jesi, 2018, Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning
- 10.1051/anphys:2006003 · DOI
- A. J. Liu, 2011, Dynamical Heterogeneities in Glasses, Colloids, and Granular Media
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.021122 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.031131 · DOI
- 10.21468/SciPostPhys.2.3.019 · DOI
- 10.1088/1751-8113/49/14/145001 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.051306 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.098301 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1093010 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.255501 · DOI
- 10.1209/0295-5075/87/26001 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1812457115 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.125502 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031214-014614 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.95.022139 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms4725 · DOI
- A. C. Anderson, 1981, Amorphous Solids: Low Temperature Properties
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.60.687 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.011306 · DOI
- 10.1039/C4SM00561A · DOI
- 10.1209/0295-5075/114/26003 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1511134112 · DOI
- 10.1039/C2SM25878A · DOI
- 10.1039/c3sm50515d · DOI
- 10.1209/0295-5075/99/58003 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.205501 · DOI
- 10.1088/1742-5468/2014/10/P10009 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.125504 · DOI
- X. Gastaldi, 2017, Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations
- A. M. Saxe, 2014, Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations
- D. P. Kingma, 2015, Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations
- J. Pennington, 2017, Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep double descent: where bigger models and more data hurt*
Nakkiran, P., Kaplun, G., Bansal, Y., Yang, T., Barak, B., & Sutskever, I. (2021) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ac3a74 · Cited by 565
Memorizing without overfitting: Bias, variance, and interpolation in overparameterized models
Rocks, J. W., & Mehta, P. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.013201 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Geiger, M., Spigler, S., d'Ascoli, S., Sagun, L., Baity-Jesi, M., Biroli, G., & Wyart, M.
- Affiliations
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2019-07-11
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 012115-012115
- ISSN
- 2470-0045 (ISSN-L)
- 2470-0053
- OpenAlex
- W2959995783
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 20
- FWCI
- 9.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical review. E (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Simons Foundation (454935, 454953)
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (200021-165509)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
- Keywords
- jamming transition, loss landscape, deep neural network, overparameterization, phase transitions, Hessian spectrum, perceptron, fully connected networks, power-law distribution, avalanche dynamics, learning dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review