Learning to flock through reinforcement
Open accessAbstract
Flocks of birds, schools of fish, and insect swarms are examples of the coordinated motion of a group that arises spontaneously from the action of many individuals. Here, we study flocking behavior from the viewpoint of multiagent reinforcement learning. In this setting, a learning agent tries to keep contact with the group using as sensory input the velocity of its neighbors. This goal is pursued by each learning individual by exerting a limited control on its own direction of motion. By means of standard reinforcement learning algorithms we show that (i) a learning agent exposed to a group of teachers, i.e., hard-wired flocking agents, learns to follow them, and (ii) in the absence of teachers, a group of independently learning agents evolves towards a state where each agent knows how to flock. In both scenarios, the emergent policy (or navigation strategy) corresponds to the polar velocity alignment mechanism of the well-known Vicsek model. These results (a) show that such a velocity alignment may have naturally evolved as an adaptive behavior that aims at minimizing the rate of neighbor loss, and (b) prove that this alignment does not only favor (local) polar order, but it corresponds to the best policy or strategy to keep group cohesion when the sensory input is limited to the velocity of neighboring agents. In short, to stay together, steer together.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the multi-agent setting, reinforcement learning has been used to study animal behaviour in areas including predatory-prey dynamics and collective/swarm movement.
“In the multi-agent setting, it has been used to study animal behaviour in areas including predatory-prey dynamics [43,44] and collective/swarm movement [45,46].”
From Maynard Smith revisited: A multi-agent reinforcement learning approach to the coevolution of signalling behaviour (2025) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 58
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- [9]J. Herbert-Read, A. Perna, R. Mann, T. Schaerf, D. Sumpter, and A. Ward, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 , 18726 (2011).
- [10]Y. Katz, K. Tunstrøm, C. Ioannou, C. Huepe, and I. Couzin, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 , 18720 (2011).
- [11]W. Bialek, A. Cavagna, I. Giardina, T. Mora, E. Silvestri, M. Viale, and A. Walczak, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 , 4786 (2012).
- [12]I. Aoki, Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries 48(8) , 1081 (1982).
- [17]D. J. Pearce, A. M. Miller, G. Rowlands, and M. S. Turner, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 , 10422 (2014).
- [20]L. Bu¸ soniu, R. Babˇ uska, and B. Schutter, IEEE trans- actions on systems, man, and cybernetics-part C: application and reviews 38 (2008).
- Authors
- Durve, M., Peruani, F., & Celani, A.
- Affiliations
- The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) (IT)
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2020-07-02
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 012601-012601
- ISSN
- 2470-0045 (ISSN-L)
- 2470-0053
- OpenAlex
- W3038780833
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical review. E (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-15-CE30-0002-01)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
- Keywords
- flocking, multi-agent reinforcement learning, Vicsek model, velocity alignment, emergent behavior, group cohesion, collective motion, swarm robotics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review