The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Asymptotic analysis of primitive model electrolytes and the electrical double layer
Abstract
The multicomponent primitive model electrolyte is analyzed using the Ornstein-Zernike equation and the asymptotic behavior of the direct correlation function. An approximation for the screening length is derived from the second-moment condition \ensuremath{\kappa}=${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\kappa}}}_{\mathit{D}}$/ \ensuremath{\surd}1-(${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\kappa}}}_{\mathit{D}}$d${)}^{2}$/2+(${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\kappa}}}_{\mathit{D}}$d${)}^{3/6}$ , where ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\kappa}}}_{\mathit{D}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1}$ is the Debye length and d is the ion diameter. This is accurate up to 1M concentration for monovalent aqueous electrolytes and considerably extends the range of validity of the classical Debye-H\"ukel theory. The asymptotic behavior of the ionic pair correlation functions is formally analyzed, and exact expressions are given for the decay length and the effective charge on the ions in terms of the direct correlation function. Three different regimes are identified: monotonic exponential, for ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\kappa}}}_{\mathit{D}}$d\ensuremath{\lesssim}\ensuremath{\surd}2, and two types of damped oscillatory, electrostatic dominated at intermediate concentrations and core dominated at high concentrations distinguished by whether or not the oscillations are in charge or in number density. The electrical double layer is also analyzed and it is shown that the asymptotic behavior of the density profiles and the interaction pressure is the same as for the bulk correlation functions. The hypernetted chain closure (with and without bridge functions) is used to obtain numerical results for binary symmetric aqueous electrolytes (monovalent with d=4 and 5 \AA{}, and divalent with d=4 \AA{}), and the three asymptotic regimes are explored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Electrostatic Screening Length in Concentrated Electrolytes Increases with Concentration
Smith, A. M., Lee, A. A., & Perkin, S. (2016) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00867 · Cited by 611
Understanding specific ion effects and the Hofmeister series
Gregory, K. P., Elliott, G. R., Robertson, H., Kumar, A., Wanless, E. J., Webber, G. B., Craig, V. S. J., Andersson, G. G., & Page, A. J. (2022) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d2cp00847e · Cited by 462
Effective Interactions Between Electric Double Layers
Hansen, J.-P., & Löwen, H. (2000) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.51.1.209 · Cited by 451
Underscreening in concentrated electrolytes
Lee, A. A., Perez-Martinez, C. S., Smith, A. M., & Perkin, S. (2017) · Faraday Discussions · doi:10.1039/c6fd00250a · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Attard, P.
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1993-11-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3604-3621
- ISSN
- 1063-651X (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3787
- OpenAlex
- W1987543196
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Asymptotic analysis of primitive model electrolytes and the electrical double layer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.48.3604
- The paper
- Attard, P. (1993). Asymptotic analysis of primitive model electrolytes and the electrical double layer. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.48.3604
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.