The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Generalized synchronization of chaos in directionally coupled chaotic systems
Abstract
Synchronization of chaotic systems is frequently taken to mean actual equality of the variables of the coupled systems as they evolve in time. We explore a generalization of this condition, which equates dynamical variables from one subsystem with a function of the variables of another subsystem. This means that synchronization implies a collapse of the overall evolution onto a subspace of the system attractor in full space. We explore this idea in systems where a response system y(t) is driven with the output of a driving system x(t), but there is no feedback to the driver. We lose generality but gain tractability with this restriction. To investigate the existence of the synchronization condition y(t)=\ensuremath{\varphi}(x(t)) we introduce the idea of mutual false nearest neighbors to determine when closeness in response space implies closeness in driving space. The synchronization condition also implies that the response dynamics is determined by the drive alone, and we provide tests for this as well. Examples are drawn from computer simulations on various known cases of synchronization and on data from nonlinear electrical circuits. Determining the presence of generalized synchronization will be quite important when one has only scalar observations from the drive and from the response systems since the use of time delay (or other) embedding methods will produce ``imperfect'' coordinates in which strict equality of the synchronized variables is unlikely to transpire.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Complex networks: structure and dynamics
BOCCALETTI, S., LATORA, V, MORENO, Y., CHAVEZ, M., & HWANG, D. (2006) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009 · Cited by 11,010
The synchronization of chaotic systems
Boccaletti, S., Kurths, J., Osipov, G., Valladares, D. L., & Zhou, C. S. (2002) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(02)00137-0 · Cited by 2,764
SOME BASIC CRYPTOGRAPHIC REQUIREMENTS FOR CHAOS-BASED CRYPTOSYSTEMS
ALVAREZ, G., & LI, S. (2006) · International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · doi:10.1142/s0218127406015970 · Cited by 2,119
Fundamentals of synchronization in chaotic systems, concepts, and applications
Pecora, L. M., Carroll, T. L., Johnson, G. A., Mar, D. J., & Heagy, J. F. (1997) · Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/1.166278 · Cited by 862
Synchronization and desynchronization in epilepsy: controversies and hypotheses.
Jiruska, P., de Curtis, M., Jefferys, J. G. R., Schevon, C. A., Schiff, S. J., & Schindler, K. (2013) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2012.239590 · Cited by 678
Metadata
- Authors
- Rulkov, N. F., Sushchik, M. M., Tsimring, L. S., & Abarbanel, H. D. I.
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1995-02-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 980-994
- ISSN
- 1063-651X (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3787
- OpenAlex
- W2054402839
- Cited by
- 1,799
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generalized synchronization of chaos in directionally coupled chaotic systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.51.980
- The paper
- Rulkov, N. F., Sushchik, M. M., Tsimring, L. S., & Abarbanel, H. D. I. (1995). Generalized synchronization of chaos in directionally coupled chaotic systems. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.51.980
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.