The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spectral form factor in a random matrix theory
Open accessAbstract
In the theory of disordered systems the spectral form factor S(\ensuremath{\tau}), the Fourier transform of the two-level correlation function with respect to the difference of energies, is linear for \ensuremath{\tau}${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\tau}}}_{\mathrm{c}}$ and constant for \ensuremath{\tau}>${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\tau}}}_{\mathrm{c}}$. Near zero and near ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\tau}}}_{\mathrm{c}}$ it exhibits oscillations which have been discussed in several recent papers. In problems of mesoscopic fluctuations and quantum chaos a comparison is often made with a random matrix theory. It turns out that, even in the simplest Gaussian unitary ensemble, these oscillations have not yet been studied there. For random matrices, the two-level correlation function \ensuremath{\rho}(${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{1}$,${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{2}$) exhibits several well-known universal properties in the large-N limit. Its Fourier transform is linear as a consequence of the short-distance universality of \ensuremath{\rho}(${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{1}$,${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{2}$). However the crossover near zero and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\tau}}}_{\mathrm{c}}$ requires one to study these correlations for finite N. For this purpose we use an exact contour-integral representation of the two-level correlation function which allows us to characterize these crossover oscillatory properties. This representation is then extended to the case in which the Hamiltonian is the sum of a deterministic part ${\mathrm{H}}_{0}$ and of a Gaussian random potential V. Finally, we consider the extension to the time-dependent case.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Black holes and random matrices
Cotler, J. S., Gur-Ari, G., Hanada, M., Polchinski, J., Saad, P., Shenker, S. H., Stanford, D., Streicher, A., & Tezuka, M. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2017)118 · Cited by 562
Rigidity of eigenvalues of generalized Wigner matrices
Erdős, L., Yau, H.-T., & Yin, J. (2012) · Advances in Mathematics · doi:10.1016/j.aim.2011.12.010 · Cited by 345
(2017) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · Cited by 323
Chaos, complexity, and random matrices
Cotler, J., Hunter-Jones, N., Liu, J., & Yoshida, B. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2017)048 · Cited by 264
Bulk universality for generalized Wigner matrices
Erdős, L., Yau, H.-T., & Yin, J. (2012) · Probability Theory and Related Fields · doi:10.1007/s00440-011-0390-3 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Brézin, E., & Hikami, S.
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1997-04-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 4067-4083
- ISSN
- 1063-651X (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3787
- OpenAlex
- W1973932938
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spectral form factor in a random matrix theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.55.4067
- The paper
- Brézin, E., & Hikami, S. (1997). Spectral form factor in a random matrix theory. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.55.4067
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.