Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interbilayer interactions from high-resolution x-ray scattering

Petrache, Horia I., Gouliaev, Nikolai, Tristram-Nagle, Stephanie, Zhang, Ruitian, Suter, Robert M., Nagle, John F.·1998·Physical Review E

Abstract

The fundamental issue of interactions between lipid bilayers is addressed experimentally and theoretically. We report high-resolution x-ray scattering data for bilayers composed of three different kinds of phosphatidylcholine lipids. These data yield the interbilayer water spacing fluctuation $\ensuremath{\sigma},$ as well as the traditional osmotic pressure $P,$ both as functions of the lamellar repeat spacing $D$ and the aqueous separation $a.$ We show theoretically how to obtain the functional form of the fluctuational free energy from the $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ data, which is then determined to within a factor that depends upon the bending modulus, ${K}_{c}.$ The resulting functional form determined from experimental data has an exponential decay rather than the power law decay that applies for hard confinement in the large $a$ regime, thereby showing that a theory of soft confinement is necessary. However, the existing theory of soft confinement predicts an exponential decay, but with a smaller decay length ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathrm{fl}}$ than we obtain. We then use these results to analyze the osmotic pressure data in terms of the bending modulus ${K}_{c}$ and the interbilayer interactions consisting of van der Waals and hydration interactions. For all three chemically different lipids we find that the decay length $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ of the hydration pressure is $1.9\ensuremath{-}2.0 \mathrm{\AA{}};$ the Hamaker parameter for the van der Waals interaction is about $5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}14} \mathrm{erg}$ if the bending moduli ${K}_{c}$ are chosen to be different for the three lipids and in the range $(0.5\ensuremath{-}0.8)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}12} \mathrm{erg}.$

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreve.57.7014

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Metadata

Authors
Petrache, H. I., Gouliaev, N., Tristram-Nagle, S., Zhang, R., Suter, R. M., & Nagle, J. F.
Venue
Physical Review E
Published
1998-06-01
Volume
57
Issue
6
Pages
7014-7024
ISSN
  • 1063-651X (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3787
OpenAlex
W2128711009
Cited by
273
References
2
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interbilayer interactions from high-resolution x-ray scattering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.57.7014
The paper
Petrache, H. I., Gouliaev, N., Tristram-Nagle, S., Zhang, R., Suter, R. M., & Nagle, J. F. (1998). Interbilayer interactions from high-resolution x-ray scattering. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.57.7014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.