The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rheological constitutive equation for a model of soft glassy materials
Open accessAbstract
We solve exactly and describe in detail a simplified scalar model for the low frequency shear rheology of foams, emulsions, slurries, etc. [P. Sollich, F. Lequeux, P. H\'ebraud, and M. E. Cates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2020 (1997)]. The model attributes similarities in the rheology of such ``soft glassy materials'' to the shared features of structural disorder and metastability. By focusing on the dynamics of mesoscopic elements, it retains a generic character. Interactions are represented by a mean-field noise temperature $x$, with a glass transition occurring at $x=1$ (in appropriate units). The exact solution of the model takes the form of a constitutive equation relating stress to strain history, from which all rheological properties can be derived. For the linear response, we find that both the storage modulus ${G}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ and the loss modulus ${G}^{\ensuremath{''}}$ vary with frequency as ${\ensuremath{\omega}}^{x\ensuremath{-}1}$ for $1<x<2$, becoming flat near the glass transition. In the glass phase, aging of the moduli is predicted. The steady shear flow curves show power-law fluid behavior for $x<2$, with a nonzero yield stress in the glass phase; the Cox-Merz rule does not hold in this non-Newtonian regime. Single and double step strains further probe the nonlinear behavior of the model, which is not well represented by the Bernstein-Kearseley-Zapas relation. Finally, we consider measurements of ${G}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ and ${G}^{\ensuremath{''}}$ at finite strain amplitude $\ensuremath{\gamma}$. Near the glass transition, ${G}^{\ensuremath{''}}$ exhibits a maximum as $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ is increased in a strain sweep. Its value can be strongly overestimated due to nonlinear effects, which can be present even when the stress response is very nearly harmonic. The largest strain ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{c}$ at which measurements still probe the linear response is predicted to be roughly frequency independent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Universal physical responses to stretch in the living cell
Trepat, X., Deng, L., An, S. S., Navajas, D., Tschumperlin, D. J., Gerthoffer, W. T., Butler, J. P., & Fredberg, J. J. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05824 · Cited by 699
Gels with sense: supramolecular materials that respond to heat, light and sound
Jones, C. D., & Steed, J. W. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00435k · Cited by 487
Cytoskeletal remodelling and slow dynamics in the living cell
Bursac, P., Lenormand, G., Fabry, B., Oliver, M., Weitz, D. A., Viasnoff, V., Butler, J. P., & Fredberg, J. J. (2005) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1404 · Cited by 486
Linear and Nonlinear Rheology of Living Cells
Kollmannsberger, P., & Fabry, B. (2011) · Annual Review of Materials Research · doi:10.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-100351 · Cited by 420
Investigating cell mechanics with atomic force microscopy
Haase, K., & Pelling, A. E. (2015) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.0970 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Sollich, P.
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1998-07-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 738-759
- ISSN
- 1063-651X (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3787
- OpenAlex
- W2087475689
- Cited by
- 752
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rheological constitutive equation for a model of soft glassy materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.58.738
- The paper
- Sollich, P. (1998). Rheological constitutive equation for a model of soft glassy materials. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.58.738
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.