Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 752

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Rheological constitutive equation for a model of soft glassy materials

Open access
Sollich, Peter·1998·Physical Review E

Abstract

We solve exactly and describe in detail a simplified scalar model for the low frequency shear rheology of foams, emulsions, slurries, etc. [P. Sollich, F. Lequeux, P. H\'ebraud, and M. E. Cates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2020 (1997)]. The model attributes similarities in the rheology of such ``soft glassy materials'' to the shared features of structural disorder and metastability. By focusing on the dynamics of mesoscopic elements, it retains a generic character. Interactions are represented by a mean-field noise temperature $x$, with a glass transition occurring at $x=1$ (in appropriate units). The exact solution of the model takes the form of a constitutive equation relating stress to strain history, from which all rheological properties can be derived. For the linear response, we find that both the storage modulus ${G}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ and the loss modulus ${G}^{\ensuremath{''}}$ vary with frequency as ${\ensuremath{\omega}}^{x\ensuremath{-}1}$ for $1<x<2$, becoming flat near the glass transition. In the glass phase, aging of the moduli is predicted. The steady shear flow curves show power-law fluid behavior for $x<2$, with a nonzero yield stress in the glass phase; the Cox-Merz rule does not hold in this non-Newtonian regime. Single and double step strains further probe the nonlinear behavior of the model, which is not well represented by the Bernstein-Kearseley-Zapas relation. Finally, we consider measurements of ${G}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ and ${G}^{\ensuremath{''}}$ at finite strain amplitude $\ensuremath{\gamma}$. Near the glass transition, ${G}^{\ensuremath{''}}$ exhibits a maximum as $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ is increased in a strain sweep. Its value can be strongly overestimated due to nonlinear effects, which can be present even when the stress response is very nearly harmonic. The largest strain ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{c}$ at which measurements still probe the linear response is predicted to be roughly frequency independent.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreve.58.738

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 752

Metadata

Authors
Sollich, P.
Venue
Physical Review E
Published
1998-07-01
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
738-759
ISSN
  • 1063-651X (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3787
OpenAlex
W2087475689
Cited by
752
References
0
FWCI
16.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rheological constitutive equation for a model of soft glassy materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.58.738
The paper
Sollich, P. (1998). Rheological constitutive equation for a model of soft glassy materials. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.58.738

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.