Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,088

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Growing scale-free networks with tunable clustering

Open access
Holme, Petter, Kim, Beom Jun·2002·Physical Review E

Abstract

We extend the standard scale-free network model to include a "triad formation step." We analyze the geometric properties of networks generated by this algorithm both analytically and by numerical calculations, and find that our model possesses the same characteristics as the standard scale-free networks such as the power-law degree distribution and the small average geodesic length, but with the high clustering at the same time. In our model, the clustering coefficient is also shown to be tunable simply by changing a control parameter---the average number of triad formation trials per time step.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreve.65.026107

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. M. E. J. Newman, 2000, J. Stat. Phys., 101, 819, 10.1023/A:1026485807148 · DOI · Paper page
  2. S. H. Strogatz, 2001, Nature (London), 410, 268, 10.1038/35065725 · DOI · Paper page
  3. A. Rapoport, 1953, Bull. Math. Biophys., 15, 523, 10.1007/BF02476440 · DOI · Paper page
  4. A. Rapoport, 1957, Bull. Math. Biophys., 19, 257, 10.1007/BF02478417 · DOI · Paper page
  5. J. A. Davis, 1967, Human Relations, 20, 181, 10.1177/001872676702000206 · DOI · Paper page
  6. I. Pool, 1978, Soc. Networks, 1, 1, 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90010-2 · DOI
  7. J. Skvoretz, 1985, Soc. Networks, 225, 10.1016/0378-8733(85)90016-4 · DOI
  8. C. C. Foster, 1963, Behav. Sci., 8, 56, 10.1002/bs.3830080107 · DOI
  9. O. Frank, 1986, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 81, 832, 10.1080/01621459.1986.10478342 · DOI · Paper page
  10. D. J. Watts, 1998, Nature (London), 393, 440, 10.1038/30918 · DOI · Paper page
  11. A.-L. Barabási, 1999, Physica A, 272, 173, 10.1016/S0378-4371(99)00291-5 · DOI · Paper page
  12. R. Albert, 1999, Nature (London), 401, 130, 10.1038/43601 · DOI · Paper page
  13. M. E. J. Newman, 2001, Phys. Rev. E, 64, 025102, 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.025102 · DOI · Paper page
  14. D. Strauss, 1986, SIAM Rev., 28, 513, 10.1137/1028156 · DOI · Paper page
  15. S. Redner, 1998, Eur. Phys. J. B, 4, 131, 10.1007/s100510050359 · DOI · Paper page
  16. S. Bilke, 2001, Phys. Rev. E, 64, 036106, 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.036106 · DOI
  17. Y. Fang, 2001, Scientometrics, 50, 273, 10.1023/A:1010573723540 · doi:10.1023/a:1010573723540

Cited by

See all 1,088

Metadata

Authors
Holme, P., & Kim, B. J.
Venue
Physical Review E
Published
2002-01-11
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
026107-026107
ISSN
  • 1063-651X (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3787
OpenAlex
W1983275606
Cited by
1,088
References
2
FWCI
10.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Growing scale-free networks with tunable clustering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.65.026107
The paper
Holme, P., & Kim, B. J. (2002). Growing scale-free networks with tunable clustering. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.65.026107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.