The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Onset of traffic congestion in complex networks
Abstract
Free traffic flow on a complex network is key to its normal and efficient functioning. Recent works indicate that many realistic networks possess connecting topologies with a scale-free feature: the probability distribution of the number of links at nodes, or the degree distribution, contains a power-law component. A natural question is then how the topology influences the dynamics of traffic flow on a complex network. Here we present two models to address this question, taking into account the network topology, the information-generating rate, and the information-processing capacity of individual nodes. For each model, we study four kinds of networks: scale-free, random, and regular networks and Cayley trees. In the first model, the capacity of packet delivery of each node is proportional to its number of links, while in the second model, it is proportional to the number of shortest paths passing through the node. We find, in both models, that there is a critical rate of information generation, below which the network traffic is free but above which traffic congestion occurs. Theoretical estimates are given for the critical point. For the first model, scale-free networks and random networks are found to be more tolerant to congestion. For the second model, the congestion condition is independent of network size and topology, suggesting that this model may be practically useful for designing communication protocols.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Cited by
The physics of spreading processes in multilayer networks
De Domenico, M., Granell, C., Porter, M. A., & Arenas, A. (2016) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3865 · Cited by 649
Efficient routing on complex networks
Yan, G., Zhou, T., Hu, B., Fu, Z.-Q., & Wang, B.-H. (2006) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.73.046108 · Cited by 631
Data based identification and prediction of nonlinear and complex dynamical systems
Wang, W.-X., Lai, Y.-C., & Grebogi, C. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.06.004 · Cited by 299
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, L., Lai, Y.-C., Park, K., & Ye, N.
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-02-24
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 026125-026125
- ISSN
- 1539-3755 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-2376
- OpenAlex
- W2095931149
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Onset of traffic congestion in complex networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.71.026125
- The paper
- Zhao, L., Lai, Y.-C., Park, K., & Ye, N. (2005). Onset of traffic congestion in complex networks. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.71.026125
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.