The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dynamics of crowd disasters: An empirical study
Open accessAbstract
Many observations of the dynamics of pedestrian crowds, including various self-organization phenomena, have been successfully described by simple many-particle models. For ethical reasons, however, there is a serious lack of experimental data regarding crowd panic. Therefore, we have analyzed video recordings of the crowd disaster in Mina/Makkah during the Hajj in 1426H on 12 January 2006. They reveal two subsequent, sudden transitions from laminar to stop-and-go and "turbulent" flows, which question many previous simulation models. While the transition from laminar to stop-and-go flows supports a recent model of bottleneck flows [D. Helbing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 168001 (2006)], the subsequent transition to turbulent flow is not yet well understood. It is responsible for sudden eruptions of pressure release comparable to earthquakes, which cause sudden displacements and the falling and trampling of people. The insights of this study into the reasons for critical crowd conditions are important for the organization of safer mass events. In particular, they allow one to understand where and when crowd accidents tend to occur. They have also led to organizational changes, which have ensured a safe Hajj in 1427H.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Statistical physics of social dynamics
Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., & Loreto, V. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.591 · Cited by 4,119
How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters
Moussaïd, M., Helbing, D., & Theraulaz, G. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1016507108 · Cited by 1,204
Self-citationThe Walking Behaviour of Pedestrian Social Groups and Its Impact on Crowd Dynamics
Moussaïd, M., Perozo, N., Garnier, S., Helbing, D., & Theraulaz, G. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010047 · Cited by 1,120
Self-citationSumpter, D. J. T. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781400837106 · Cited by 914
Pedestrian, Crowd and Evacuation Dynamics
Helbing, D., & Johansson, A. (2009) · Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_382 · Cited by 386
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Helbing, D., Johansson, A., & Al-Abideen, H. Z.
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2007-04-18
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 046109-046109
- ISSN
- 1539-3755 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-2376
- OpenAlex
- W2003152501
- Cited by
- 1,174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 72.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamics of crowd disasters: An empirical study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.75.046109
- The paper
- Helbing, D., Johansson, A., & Al-Abideen, H. Z. (2007). Dynamics of crowd disasters: An empirical study. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.75.046109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.