The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Field-theoretic approach to fluctuation effects in neural networks
Abstract
A well-defined stochastic theory for neural activity, which permits the calculation of arbitrary statistical moments and equations governing them, is a potentially valuable tool for theoretical neuroscience. We produce such a theory by analyzing the dynamics of neural activity using field theoretic methods for nonequilibrium statistical processes. Assuming that neural network activity is Markovian, we construct the effective spike model, which describes both neural fluctuations and response. This analysis leads to a systematic expansion of corrections to mean field theory, which for the effective spike model is a simple version of the Wilson-Cowan equation. We argue that neural activity governed by this model exhibits a dynamical phase transition which is in the universality class of directed percolation. More general models (which may incorporate refractoriness) can exhibit other universality classes, such as dynamic isotropic percolation. Because of the extremely high connectivity in typical networks, it is expected that higher-order terms in the systematic expansion are small for experimentally accessible measurements, and thus, consistent with measurements in neocortical slice preparations, we expect mean field exponents for the transition. We provide a quantitative criterion for the relative magnitude of each term in the systematic expansion, analogous to the Ginsburg criterion. Experimental identification of dynamic universality classes in vivo is an outstanding and important question for neuroscience.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Activity-dependent scaling of quantal amplitude in neocortical neurons
Turrigiano, G. G., Leslie, K. R., Desai, N. S., Rutherford, L. C., & Nelson, S. B. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36103 · Cited by 2,226
Cited by
The criticality hypothesis: how local cortical networks might optimize information processing
Beggs, J. M. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2007.2092 · Cited by 533
Being Critical of Criticality in the Brain
Beggs, J. M., & Timme, N. (2012) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00163 · Cited by 494
Spatiotemporal dynamics of continuum neural fields
Bressloff, P. C. (2012) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/45/3/033001 · Cited by 414
Systematic Fluctuation Expansion for Neural Network Activity Equations
Buice, M. A., Cowan, J. D., & Chow, C. C. (2010) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2009.02-09-960 · Cited by 164
Self-citationMetastable dynamics of neural circuits and networks
Brinkman, B. A. W., Yan, H., Maffei, A., Park, I. M., Fontanini, A., Wang, J., & La Camera, G. (2022) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/5.0062603 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Buice, M. A., & Cowan, J. D.
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2007-05-29
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 051919-051919
- ISSN
- 1539-3755 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-2376
- OpenAlex
- W2034525416
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Field-theoretic approach to fluctuation effects in neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.75.051919
- The paper
- Buice, M. A., & Cowan, J. D. (2007). Field-theoretic approach to fluctuation effects in neural networks. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.75.051919
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.