Cited by 61

Local leaders in random networks

Blondel, Vincent D., Guillaume, Jean-Loup, Hendrickx, Julien M., de Kerchove, Cristobald, Lambiotte, Renaud·2008·Physical Review E

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreve.77.036114

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Iterative PCA-Louvain clustering with stepwise cluster robustness assessment identified 14 distinct cell clusters with a minimum of 8 cells per cluster.

    “we ran an iterative PCA-Louvain clustering approach15,16 with stepwise cluster robustness assessment and identified 14 distinct cell clusters with a minimum of 8 cells per cluster”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. M.E.J. Newman, SIAM Review 45, 167-256 (2003).
  2. A.-L. Barabási, Linked, (Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2002).
  3. A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert, Science 286, 509 (1999).
  4. M. Boguñá, R. Pastor-Satorras and A. Vespignani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 028701 (2003).
  5. V. Sood and S. Redner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 178701 (2005).
  6. J. Leskovec, L.A. Adamic, B.A. Huberman, physics/0509039. · arXiv
  7. S. Galam, Physica 274, 132 (1999).
  8. R. Lambiotte, EPL 78, 68002 (2007).
  9. D.S. Callaway, M.E.J. Newman, S.H. Strogatz and D.J. Watts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5468 (2000).
  10. R. Pastor-Satorras and A. Vespignani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3200 (2001).
  11. R.M. May and A.L. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. E 64, 066112 (2001).
  12. A.A. Moreira, J.S. de Andrade Jr., and L.A.N. Amaral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 268703 (2002).
  13. P.L. Krapivsky and S. Redner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 258703 (2002).
  14. T. Luczak, Random Struct. Algorithms 1, 287 (1990);
  15. P. Erdős and T. Luczak, Random Struct. Algorithms 5, 243 (1994).
  16. M.E.J. Newman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 208701 (2002).
  17. H.E. Stanley, Introduction to Phase Transitions and Crit- ical Phenomena (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1971).
  18. R.L. Graham, D.E. Knuth, and O. Patashnik, Con- crete Mathematics : A Foundation for Computer Science (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1989).
  19. M. Catanzaro, M. Boguñá and R. Pastor-Satorras Phys. Rev. E 71, 027103 (2005) (4 pages).
  20. W.-H. Au, K.C.C. Chan and X. Yao, IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary Computation 7,532-545 (2003).
  21. P.L. Krapivsky and S. Redner, Phys. Rev. E 71, 036118 (2005).
  22. R. Lambiotte and M. Ausloos, EPL 77, 58002 (2007).
  23. M.E.J. Newman, SIAM Review, 45,167 (2003).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Hendrickx, J. M., de Kerchove, C., & Lambiotte, R.
Venue
Physical Review E
Published
2008-03-13
Volume
77
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1539-3755
  • 1550-2376
Cited by
61
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review