The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Voter models on heterogeneous networks
Open accessAbstract
We study simple interacting particle systems on heterogeneous networks, including the voter model and the invasion process. These are both two-state models in which in an update event an individual changes state to agree with a neighbor. For the voter model, an individual "imports" its state from a randomly chosen neighbor. Here the average time TN to reach consensus for a network of N nodes with an uncorrelated degree distribution scales as N mu1 2/mu2, where mu k is the kth moment of the degree distribution. Quick consensus thus arises on networks with broad degree distributions. We also identify the conservation law that characterizes the route by which consensus is reached. Parallel results are derived for the invasion process, in which the state of an agent is "exported" to a random neighbor. We further generalize to biased dynamics in which one state is favored. The probability for a single fitter mutant located at a node of degree k to overspread the population-the fixation probability--is proportional to k for the voter model and to 1k for the invasion process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life
NOWAK, M. A. (2006) · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjghw98 · Cited by 2,438
Cited by
Statistical physics of social dynamics
Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., & Loreto, V. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.591 · Cited by 4,119
The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks
Boccaletti, S., Bianconi, G., Criado, R., del Genio, C. I., Gómez-Gardeñes, J., Romance, M., Sendiña-Nadal, I., Wang, Z., & Zanin, M. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.07.001 · Cited by 3,125
Random walks and diffusion on networks
Masuda, N., Porter, M. A., & Lambiotte, R. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.07.007 · Cited by 657
The emergence of consensus: a primer
Baronchelli, A. (2018) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.172189 · Cited by 161
Social goods dilemmas in heterogeneous societies
McAvoy, A., Allen, B., & Nowak, M. A. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0881-2 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Sood, V., Antal, T., & Redner, S.
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-04-22
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 041121-041121
- ISSN
- 1539-3755 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-2376
- OpenAlex
- W2011047110
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Voter models on heterogeneous networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.77.041121
- The paper
- Sood, V., Antal, T., & Redner, S. (2008). Voter models on heterogeneous networks. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.77.041121
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.