Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Biased random walks in complex networks: The role of local navigation rules

Open access
Fronczak, Agata, Fronczak, Piotr·2009·Physical Review E

Abstract

We study the biased random-walk process in random uncorrelated networks with arbitrary degree distributions. In our model, the bias is defined by the preferential transition probability, which, in recent years, has been commonly used to study the efficiency of different routing protocols in communication networks. We derive exact expressions for the stationary occupation probability and for the mean transit time between two nodes. The effect of the cyclic search on transit times is also explored. Results presented in this paper provide the basis for a theoretical treatment of transport-related problems in complex networks, including quantitative estimation of the critical value of the packet generation rate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreve.80.016107

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Fronczak, A., & Fronczak, P.
Venue
Physical Review E
Published
2009-07-13
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
016107-016107
ISSN
  • 1539-3755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-2376
OpenAlex
W2168586324
Cited by
176
References
0
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biased random walks in complex networks: The role of local navigation rules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.80.016107
The paper
Fronczak, A., & Fronczak, P. (2009). Biased random walks in complex networks: The role of local navigation rules. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.80.016107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.