Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 248

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interdependent networks with identical degrees of mutually dependent nodes

Open access
Buldyrev, Sergey V., Shere, Nathaniel W., Cwilich, Gabriel A.·2011·Physical Review E

Abstract

We study a problem of failure of two interdependent networks in the case of identical degrees of mutually dependent nodes. We assume that both networks (A and B) have the same number of nodes N connected by the bidirectional dependency links establishing a one-to-one correspondence between the nodes of the two networks in a such a way that the mutually dependent nodes have the same number of connectivity links; i.e., their degrees coincide. This implies that both networks have the same degree distribution P(k). We call such networks correspondently coupled networks (CCNs). We assume that the nodes in each network are randomly connected. We define the mutually connected clusters and the mutual giant component as in earlier works on randomly coupled interdependent networks and assume that only the nodes that belong to the mutual giant component remain functional. We assume that initially a 1-p fraction of nodes are randomly removed because of an attack or failure and find analytically, for an arbitrary P(k), the fraction of nodes μ(p) that belong to the mutual giant component. We find that the system undergoes a percolation transition at a certain fraction p=p(c), which is always smaller than p(c) for randomly coupled networks with the same P(k). We also find that the system undergoes a first-order transition at p(c)>0 if P(k) has a finite second moment. For the case of scale-free networks with 2<λ≤3, the transition becomes a second-order transition. Moreover, if λ<3, we find p(c)=0, as in percolation of a single network. For λ=3 we find an exact analytical expression for p(c)>0. Finally, we find that the robustness of CCN increases with the broadness of their degree distribution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreve.83.016112

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 248

Metadata

Authors
Buldyrev, S. V., Shere, N. W., & Cwilich, G. A.
Venue
Physical Review E
Published
2011-01-27
Volume
83
Issue
1
Pages
016112-016112
ISSN
  • 1539-3755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-2376
OpenAlex
W1650742658
Cited by
248
References
1
FWCI
16.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interdependent networks with identical degrees of mutually dependent nodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.83.016112
The paper
Buldyrev, S. V., Shere, N. W., & Cwilich, G. A. (2011). Interdependent networks with identical degrees of mutually dependent nodes. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.83.016112

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.