Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 432

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cascade of failures in coupled network systems with multiple support-dependence relations

Open access
Shao, Jia, Buldyrev, Sergey V., Havlin, Shlomo, Stanley, H. Eugene·2011·Physical Review E

Abstract

We study, both analytically and numerically, the cascade of failures in two coupled network systems A and B, where multiple support-dependence relations are randomly built between nodes of networks A and B. In our model we assume that each node in one network can function only if it has at least a single support link connecting it to a functional node in the other network. We assume that networks A and B have (i) sizes ${N}^{A}$ and ${N}^{B}$, (ii) degree distributions of connectivity links ${P}^{A}(k)$ and ${P}^{B}(k)$, (iii) degree distributions of support links ${\mathrm{P\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}}^{A}(k)$ and ${\mathrm{P\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}}^{B}(k)$, and (iv) random attack removes $(1\ensuremath{-}{R}^{A}){N}^{A}$ and $(1\ensuremath{-}{R}^{B}){N}^{B}$ nodes form the networks A and B, respectively. We find the fractions of nodes ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\ensuremath{\infty}}^{A}$ and ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\ensuremath{\infty}}^{B}$ which remain functional (giant component) at the end of the cascade process in networks A and B in terms of the generating functions of the degree distributions of their connectivity and support links. In a special case of Erd\ifmmode \mbox{\H{o}}\else \H{o}\fi{}s-R\'enyi networks with average degrees $a$ and $b$ in networks A and B, respectively, and Poisson distributions of support links with average degrees $\mathrm{a\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}$ and $\mathrm{b\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}$ in networks A and B, respectively, ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\ensuremath{\infty}}^{A}={R}^{A}[1\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{exp}(\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{a\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\ensuremath{\infty}}^{B})][1\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{exp}(\ensuremath{-}a{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\ensuremath{\infty}}^{A})]$ and ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\ensuremath{\infty}}^{B}={R}^{B}[1\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{exp}(\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{b\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\ensuremath{\infty}}^{A})][1\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{exp}(\ensuremath{-}b{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\ensuremath{\infty}}^{B})]$. In the limit of $\mathrm{a\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$ and $\mathrm{b\ifmmode \tilde{}\else \~{}\fi{}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$, both networks become independent, and our model becomes equivalent to a random attack on a single Erd\ifmmode \mbox{\H{o}}\else \H{o}\fi{}s-R\'enyi network. We also test our theory on two coupled scale-free networks, and find good agreement with the simulations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreve.83.036116

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 432

Metadata

Authors
Shao, J., Buldyrev, S. V., Havlin, S., & Stanley, H. E.
Venue
Physical Review E
Published
2011-03-29
Volume
83
Issue
3
Pages
036116-036116
ISSN
  • 1539-3755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-2376
OpenAlex
W1879056329
Cited by
432
References
4
FWCI
21.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cascade of failures in coupled network systems with multiple support-dependence relations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.83.036116
The paper
Shao, J., Buldyrev, S. V., Havlin, S., & Stanley, H. E. (2011). Cascade of failures in coupled network systems with multiple support-dependence relations. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.83.036116

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.