Cited by 30Lattice Boltzmann Simulation StudiesQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Mechanics and Applications

Isotropy of three-dimensional quantum lattice Boltzmann schemes

Dellar, P. J., Lapitski, D., Palpacelli, S., Succi, S.·2011·Physical Review E

Abstract

Numerical simulations with previous formulations of the quantum lattice Boltzmann (QLB) scheme in three spatial dimensions showed significant lack of isotropy. In two or more spatial dimensions the QLB approach relies upon operator splitting to decompose the time evolution into a sequence of applications of the one-dimensional QLB scheme along coordinate axes. Each application must be accompanied by a rotation of the wave function into a basis of chiral eigenstates aligned along the relevant axis. The previously observed lack of isotropy was due to an inconsistency in the application of these rotations. Once this inconsistency is removed, the QLB scheme is shown to exhibit isotropic behavior to within a numerical error that scales approximately linearly with the lattice spacing. This establishes the viability of the QLB approach in two and three spatial dimensions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreve.83.046706

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dellar, P. J., Lapitski, D., Palpacelli, S., & Succi, S.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Physical Review E
Published
2011-04-07
Volume
83
Issue
4
Pages
046706-046706
ISSN
  • 1539-3755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-2376
OpenAlex
W2036519712
Cited by
30
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Review E (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
isotropy, operator splitting, quantum many-body dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review