The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of complex contagions in random multiplex networks
Open accessAbstract
We study the diffusion of influence in random multiplex networks where links can be of r different types, and, for a given content (e.g., rumor, product, or political view), each link type is associated with a content-dependent parameter ci in [0,∞] that measures the relative bias type i links have in spreading this content. In this setting, we propose a linear threshold model of contagion where nodes switch state if their "perceived" proportion of active neighbors exceeds a threshold τ. Namely a node connected to mi active neighbors and ki-mi inactive neighbors via type i links will turn active if ∑cimi/∑ciki exceeds its threshold τ. Under this model, we obtain the condition, probability and expected size of global spreading events. Our results extend the existing work on complex contagions in several directions by (i) providing solutions for coupled random networks whose vertices are neither identical nor disjoint, (ii) highlighting the effect of content on the dynamics of complex contagions, and (iii) showing that content-dependent propagation over a multiplex network leads to a subtle relation between the giant vulnerable component of the graph and the global cascade condition that is not seen in the existing models in the literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bollobás, B. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814068 · Cited by 2,639
Seed size strongly affects cascades on random networks
Gleeson, J. P., & Cahalane, D. J. (2007) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.75.056103 · Cited by 273
Cited by
Kivela, M., Arenas, A., Barthelemy, M., Gleeson, J. P., Moreno, Y., & Porter, M. A. (2014) · Journal of Complex Networks · doi:10.1093/comnet/cnu016 · Cited by 3,235
The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks
Boccaletti, S., Bianconi, G., Criado, R., del Genio, C. I., Gómez-Gardeñes, J., Romance, M., Sendiña-Nadal, I., Wang, Z., & Zanin, M. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.07.001 · Cited by 3,125
Mathematical Formulation of Multilayer Networks
De Domenico, M., Solé-Ribalta, A., Cozzo, E., Kivelä, M., Moreno, Y., Porter, M. A., Gómez, S., & Arenas, A. (2013) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.3.041022 · Cited by 930
Dynamics of information diffusion and its applications on complex networks
Zhang, Z.-K., Liu, C., Zhan, X.-X., Lu, X., Zhang, C.-X., & Zhang, Y.-C. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.07.002 · Cited by 484
MuxViz: a tool for multilayer analysis and visualization of networks
De Domenico, M., Porter, M. A., & Arenas, A. (2015) · Journal of Complex Networks · doi:10.1093/comnet/cnu038 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Yağan, O., & Gligor, V.
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2012-09-10
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 036103-036103
- ISSN
- 1539-3755 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-2376
- OpenAlex
- W2027367074
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of complex contagions in random multiplex networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.86.036103
- The paper
- Yağan, O., & Gligor, V. (2012). Analysis of complex contagions in random multiplex networks. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.86.036103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.