The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robustness of network of networks under targeted attack
Abstract
The robustness of a network of networks (NON) under random attack has been studied recently [Gao et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 195701 (2011)]. Understanding how robust a NON is to targeted attacks is a major challenge when designing resilient infrastructures. We address here the question how the robustness of a NON is affected by targeted attack on high- or low-degree nodes. We introduce a targeted attack probability function that is dependent upon node degree and study the robustness of two types of NON under targeted attack: (i) a tree of n fully interdependent Erdős-Rényi or scale-free networks and (ii) a starlike network of n partially interdependent Erdős-Rényi networks. For any tree of n fully interdependent Erdős-Rényi networks and scale-free networks under targeted attack, we find that the network becomes significantly more vulnerable when nodes of higher degree have higher probability to fail. When the probability that a node will fail is proportional to its degree, for a NON composed of Erdős-Rényi networks we find analytical solutions for the mutual giant component P(∞) as a function of p, where 1-p is the initial fraction of failed nodes in each network. We also find analytical solutions for the critical fraction p(c), which causes the fragmentation of the n interdependent networks, and for the minimum average degree k[over ¯](min) below which the NON will collapse even if only a single node fails. For a starlike NON of n partially interdependent Erdős-Rényi networks under targeted attack, we find the critical coupling strength q(c) for different n. When q>q(c), the attacked system undergoes an abrupt first order type transition. When q≤q(c), the system displays a smooth second order percolation transition. We also evaluate how the central network becomes more vulnerable as the number of networks with the same coupling strength q increases. The limit of q=0 represents no dependency, and the results are consistent with the classical percolation theory of a single network under targeted attack.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Newman, M. (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206650.001.0001 · Cited by 6,595
Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies
(2001) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/37.969131 · Cited by 2,851
Cascade-based attacks on complex networks
Motter, A. E., & Lai, Y.-C. (2002) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.66.065102 · Cited by 1,929
Dorogovtsev, S. N., & Mendes, J. F. F. (2003) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198515906.001.0001 · Cited by 1,563
Avalanche Collapse of Interdependent Networks
Baxter, G. J., Dorogovtsev, S. N., Goltsev, A. V., & Mendes, J. F. F. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.248701 · Cited by 376
Cited by
Percolation on complex networks: Theory and application
Li, M., Liu, R.-R., Lü, L., Hu, M.-B., Xu, S., & Zhang, Y.-C. (2021) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.12.003 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Dong, G., Gao, J., Du, R., Tian, L., Stanley, H. E., & Havlin, S.
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2013-05-16
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 052804-052804
- ISSN
- 1539-3755 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-2376
- OpenAlex
- W2061026255
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 14.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robustness of network of networks under targeted attack. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.87.052804
- The paper
- Dong, G., Gao, J., Du, R., Tian, L., Stanley, H. E., & Havlin, S. (2013). Robustness of network of networks under targeted attack. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.87.052804
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.