Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 116

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of surface wettability and liquid viscosity on the dynamic wetting of individual drops

Chen, Longquan, Bonaccurso, Elmar·2014·Physical Review E

Abstract

In this paper, we experimentally investigated the dynamic spreading of liquid drops on solid surfaces. Drop of glycerol water mixtures and pure water that have comparable surface tensions (62.3-72.8 mN/m) but different viscosities (1.0-60.1 cP) were used. The size of the drops was 0.5-1.2 mm. Solid surfaces with different lyophilic and lyophobic coatings (equilibrium contact angle θ(eq) of 0°-112°) were used to study the effect of surface wettability. We show that surface wettability and liquid viscosity influence wetting dynamics and affect either the coefficient or the exponent of the power law that describes the growth of the wetting radius. In the early inertial wetting regime, the coefficient of the wetting power law increases with surface wettability but decreases with liquid viscosity. In contrast, the exponent of the power law does only depend on surface wettability as also reported in literature. It was further found that surface wettability does not affect the duration of inertial wetting, whereas the viscosity of the liquid does. For low viscosity liquids, the duration of inertial wetting corresponds to the time of capillary wave propagation, which can be determined by Lamb's drop oscillation model for inviscid liquids. For relatively high viscosity liquids, the inertial wetting time increases with liquid viscosity, which may due to the viscous damping of the surface capillary waves. Furthermore, we observed a viscous wetting regime only on surfaces with an equilib…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreve.90.022401

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. P. G. de Gennes, 1984, C. R. Acad. Sci., Ser. II: Mec., Phys., Chim., Sci. Terre Univers, 298, 111
  2. P. G. de Gennes, 2004, Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena, 10.1007/978-0-387-21656-0 · DOI
  3. P. S. de Laplace, 1805, Traité de Mécanique Céleste
  4. 10.1002/andp.19013090306 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/andp.19153510306 · DOI
  6. 10.1088/0022-3727/12/9/009 · DOI
  7. 10.1098/rstl.1805.0005 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.016301 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.234501 · DOI
  10. 10.1021/j100280a075 · DOI
  11. 10.1021/la3046862 · DOI
  12. 10.1039/c1sm05967j · DOI
  13. L. Q. Chen, 2012, Appl. Phys. Lett., 101, 3
  14. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/46/464127 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/RevModPhys.57.827 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0021-9797(71)90188-3 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s00396-011-2475-z · DOI
  18. O. A. Soboleva, 1991, Kolloidn. Zh., 53, 1106
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.055301 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.026103 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.04.079 · DOI
  22. 10.1080/00986448108910901 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0021-9797(76)90111-9 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/ncomms2619 · DOI
  25. 10.1017/jfm.2012.539 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/srep00927 · DOI
  27. 10.1039/c2sm26714d · DOI
  28. 10.1063/1.4788693 · DOI
  29. 10.1063/1.870063 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/aic.690400205 · DOI
  31. 10.1021/j100339a067 · DOI
  32. 1963, Physical Properties of Glycerine and Its Solutions
  33. 10.1007/BF00647204 · DOI
  34. 10.1021/ie50501a040 · DOI
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevE.88.033010 · DOI
  36. 10.1017/S002211209900662X · DOI
  37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.114501 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.04.046 · DOI
  39. 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.045302 · DOI
  40. 10.1063/1.3275853 · DOI
  41. 10.1017/jfm.2011.211 · DOI
  42. H. Lamb, 1932, Hydrodynamics
  43. 10.1021/la062149f · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Chen, L., & Bonaccurso, E.
Venue
Physical Review E
Published
2014-08-04
Volume
90
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 1539-3755
  • 1550-2376
Cited by
116
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.