The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Discovering phases, phase transitions, and crossovers through unsupervised machine learning: A critical examination
Open accessAbstract
We apply unsupervised machine learning techniques, mainly principal component analysis (PCA), to compare and contrast the phase behavior and phase transitions in several classical spin models-the square- and triangular-lattice Ising models, the Blume-Capel model, a highly degenerate biquadratic-exchange spin-1 Ising (BSI) model, and the two-dimensional XY model-and we examine critically what machine learning is teaching us. We find that quantified principal components from PCA not only allow the exploration of different phases and symmetry-breaking, but they can distinguish phase-transition types and locate critical points. We show that the corresponding weight vectors have a clear physical interpretation, which is particularly interesting in the frustrated models such as the triangular antiferromagnet, where they can point to incipient orders. Unlike the other well-studied models, the properties of the BSI model are less well known. Using both PCA and conventional Monte Carlo analysis, we demonstrate that the BSI model shows an absence of phase transition and macroscopic ground-state degeneracy. The failure to capture the "charge" correlations (vorticity) in the BSI model (XY model) from raw spin configurations points to some of the limitations of PCA. Finally, we employ a nonlinear unsupervised machine learning procedure, the "autoencoder method," and we demonstrate that it too can be trained to capture phase transitions and critical points.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques
(2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-19715-5 · Cited by 25,437
Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks
Hinton, G. E., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1127647 · Cited by 20,928
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space
Pearson, K. (1901) · The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science · doi:10.1080/14786440109462720 · Cited by 11,934
Jolliffe, I. T. (1986) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-1904-8 · Cited by 8,273
Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups
White, S. R. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2863 · Cited by 7,702
Crystal Statistics. I. A Two-Dimensional Model with an Order-Disorder Transition
Onsager, L. (1944) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.65.117 · Cited by 6,510
Machine Learning for High-Speed Corner Detection
Rosten, E., & Drummond, T. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11744023_34 · Cited by 4,555
Cited by
Explainable machine learning for scientific insights and discoveries
Roscher, R., Bohn, B., Duarte, M. F., & Garcke, J. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2976199 · Cited by 1,040
“similar way, [83] and [84] use principal component analysis and the derived interpretable principal components for exploration of different phases, phase-transition, and crossovers in classical spin models.”
MethodFrom DFT to machine learning: recent approaches to materials science–a review
Schleder, G. R., Padilha, A. C. M., Acosta, C. M., Costa, M., & Fazzio, A. (2019) · Journal of Physics: Materials · doi:10.1088/2515-7639/ab084b · Cited by 852
Machine learning meets quantum foundations: A brief survey
Bharti, K., Haug, T., Vedral, V., & Kwek, L.-C. (2020) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0007529 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, W., Singh, R. R. P., & Scalettar, R. T.
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2017-06-19
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 062122-062122
- ISSN
- 2470-0045 (ISSN-L)
- 2470-0053
- OpenAlex
- W2623750799
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 20.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discovering phases, phase transitions, and crossovers through unsupervised machine learning: A critical examination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.95.062122
- The paper
- Hu, W., Singh, R. R. P., & Scalettar, R. T. (2017). Discovering phases, phase transitions, and crossovers through unsupervised machine learning: A critical examination. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.95.062122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.