The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Versatile and efficient pore network extraction method using marker-based watershed segmentation
Abstract
Obtaining structural information from tomographic images of porous materials is a critical component of porous media research. Extracting pore networks is particularly valuable since it enables pore network modeling simulations which can be useful for a host of tasks from predicting transport properties to simulating performance of entire devices. This work reports an efficient algorithm for extracting networks using only standard image analysis techniques. The algorithm was applied to several standard porous materials ranging from sandstone to fibrous mats, and in all cases agreed very well with established or known values for pore and throat sizes, capillary pressure curves, and permeability. In the case of sandstone, the present algorithm was compared to the network obtained using the current state-of-the-art algorithm, and very good agreement was achieved. Most importantly, the network extracted from an image of fibrous media correctly predicted the anisotropic permeability tensor, demonstrating the critical ability to detect key structural features. The highly efficient algorithm allows extraction on fairly large images of 500^{3} voxels in just over 200 s. The ability for one algorithm to match materials as varied as sandstone with 20% porosity and fibrous media with 75% porosity is a significant advancement. The source code for this algorithm is provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089 · Cited by 64,638
Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications
(2000) · Sensor Review · doi:10.1108/sr.2000.08720cae.001 · Cited by 3,537
Pore-network extraction from micro-computerized-tomography images
Dong, H., & Blunt, M. J. (2009) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.80.036307 · Cited by 1,282
Wildenschild, D., & Sheppard, A. P. (2013) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.07.018 · Cited by 1,239
Sahimi, M. (1993) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.65.1393 · Cited by 1,082
Maurer, C. R., Qi, R., & Raghavan, V. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2003.1177156 · Cited by 911
Distance transformations in arbitrary dimensions
Borgefors, G. (1984) · Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing · doi:10.1016/0734-189x(84)90035-5 · Cited by 779
An evaluation of lattice Boltzmann schemes for porous medium flow simulation
Pan, C., Luo, L.-S., & Miller, C. T. (2006) · Computers & Fluids · doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2005.03.008 · Cited by 753
The permeability of fibrous porous media
Jackson, G. W., & James, D. F. (1986) · The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450640302 · Cited by 646
Nanoporous Membranes Derived from Block Copolymers: From Drug Delivery to Water Filtration
Jackson, E. A., & Hillmyer, M. A. (2010) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn1014006 · Cited by 623
Metadata
- Authors
- Gostick, J. T.
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2017-08-16
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 023307-023307
- ISSN
- 2470-0045 (ISSN-L)
- 2470-0053
- OpenAlex
- W2749066189
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 17.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Versatile and efficient pore network extraction method using marker-based watershed segmentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.96.023307
- The paper
- Gostick, J. T. (2017). Versatile and efficient pore network extraction method using marker-based watershed segmentation. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.96.023307
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.