Cited by 47

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Traffic flow in a crowd of pedestrians walking at different speeds

Fujita, Akihiro, Feliciani, Claudio, Yanagisawa, Daichi, Nishinari, Katsuhiro·2019·Physical Review E

Abstract

This study investigates motion in a crowd of pedestrians walking at different speeds. Three pedestrian groups are considered (slow walkers, normal walkers, and fast walkers), and we design the experimental condition by mixing the normal walkers with either the slow or the fast walkers to create flows with different speed compositions. All the walkers in this experiment were instructed to walk along a circular course unidirectionally. Fundamental diagrams and multiple regression analysis show that the speed at which a particular pedestrian walks is determined by both the local density and the speed at which the surrounding pedestrians are walking. We also find that the spontaneous lane formation, that occurs in bidirectional flow, does not occur in flow in which the speed is heterogeneous, thereby resulting in a spatial density distribution with large variance. This corresponds to pedestrian clustering, which reduces both the mean speed and the flow rate.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreve.99.062307

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1140/epjds7 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.cviu.2011.08.006 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/35035023 · DOI
  4. 10.1088/1742-5468/2005/10/P10002 · DOI
  5. A. Seyfried, 2010, Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2008
  6. 10.1088/1742-5468/2011/06/P06004 · DOI
  7. M. Boltes, 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops)
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.016111 · DOI
  9. 10.1142/S0219525909002209 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.164 · DOI
  11. C. Thornton, 2011, Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics
  12. 10.17815/CD.2016.3 · DOI
  13. 10.1088/1742-5468/2015/10/P10003 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.physa.2015.08.002 · DOI
  15. H. Klüpfel, 2003, Traffic and Granular Flow'01
  16. 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.12.019 · DOI
  17. 10.3141/2206-05 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.simpat.2012.02.003 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.017 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.012312 · DOI
  21. 10.2307/1937887 · DOI
  22. 10.1287/trsc.1040.0108 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.physa.2004.01.043 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.physa.2011.07.022 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.physa.2016.01.057 · DOI
  26. 10.1088/1742-5468/2012/02/P02002 · DOI
  27. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002442 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.trc.2018.03.027 · DOI
  29. 10.1371/journal.pone.0208496 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fujita, A., Feliciani, C., Yanagisawa, D., & Nishinari, K.
Venue
Physical Review E
Published
2019-06-17
Volume
99
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 2470-0045
  • 2470-0053
Cited by
47
References
0
Language
en
Funders
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JPMJMI17D4)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP15K17583)
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review