The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Test of the Equivalence Principle Using a Rotating Torsion Balance
Open accessAbstract
We used a continuously rotating torsion balance instrument to measure the acceleration difference of beryllium and titanium test bodies towards sources at a variety of distances. Our result $\ensuremath{\Delta}{a}_{\mathrm{N},\mathrm{Be}\mathrm{\text{\ensuremath{-}}}\mathrm{Ti}}=(0.6\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}3.1)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}15}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{m}/{\mathrm{s}}^{2}$ improves limits on equivalence-principle violations with ranges from 1 m to $\ensuremath{\infty}$ by an order of magnitude. The E\"otv\"os parameter is ${\ensuremath{\eta}}_{\mathrm{Earth},\mathrm{Be}\mathrm{\text{\ensuremath{-}}}\mathrm{Ti}}=(0.3\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.8)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}13}$. By analyzing our data for accelerations towards the center of the Milky Way we find equal attractions of Be and Ti towards galactic dark matter, yielding ${\ensuremath{\eta}}_{\mathrm{DM},\mathrm{Be}\mathrm{\text{\ensuremath{-}}}\mathrm{Ti}}=(\ensuremath{-}4\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}7)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}5}$. Space-fixed differential accelerations in any direction are limited to less than $8.8\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}15}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{m}/{\mathrm{s}}^{2}$ with 95% confidence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
Advances in the Casimir Effect
Bordag, M., Klimchitskaya, G. L., Mohideen, U., & Mostepanenko, V. M. (2009) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238743.001.0001 · Cited by 1,284
Beyond the cosmological standard model
Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., & Trodden, M. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002 · Cited by 1,231
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2001) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2001-4 · Cited by 523
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlamminger, S., Choi, K.-Y., Wagner, T. A., Gundlach, J. H., & Adelberger, E. G.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-01-28
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 041101-041101
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2026828586
- Cited by
- 781
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Test of the Equivalence Principle Using a Rotating Torsion Balance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.100.041101
- The paper
- Schlamminger, S., Choi, K.-Y., Wagner, T. A., Gundlach, J. H., & Adelberger, E. G. (2008). Test of the Equivalence Principle Using a Rotating Torsion Balance. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.100.041101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.