The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Area Laws in Quantum Systems: Mutual Information and Correlations
Open accessAbstract
The holographic principle states that on a fundamental level the information content of a region should depend on its surface area rather than on its volume. In this Letter we show that this phenomenon not only emerges in the search for new Planck-scale laws but also in lattice models of classical and quantum physics: the information contained in part of a system in thermal equilibrium obeys an area law. While the maximal information per unit area depends classically only on the number of degrees of freedom, it may diverge as the inverse temperature in quantum systems. It is shown that an area law is generally implied by a finite correlation length when measured in terms of the mutual information.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus we see that, as one might expect from our discussion around (3.19), the presence of nonzero correlation between O and X E puts a limit on how accurately we can correct for the erasure of E .”
From Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT (2015) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 20,450
Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons
Kitaev, A. Y. (2003) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/s0003-4916(02)00018-0 · Cited by 7,238
Raussendorf, R., & Briegel, H. J. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.5188 · Cited by 4,477
Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory
Calabrese, P., & Cardy, J. (2004) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2004/06/p06002 · Cited by 3,275
Entanglement in Quantum Critical Phenomena
Vidal, G., Latorre, J. I., Rico, E., & Kitaev, A. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.227902 · Cited by 2,793
Persistent Entanglement in Arrays of Interacting Particles
Briegel, H. J., & Raussendorf, R. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.910 · Cited by 1,950
Scaling of entanglement close to a quantum phase transition
Osterloh, A., Amico, L., Falci, G., & Fazio, R. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416608a · Cited by 1,860
Srednicki, M. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.666 · Cited by 1,858
Entanglement in a simple quantum phase transition
Osborne, T. J., & Nielsen, M. A. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.66.032110 · Cited by 1,472
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- H. Casini, J. Stat. Mech., 2005, P07007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Colloquium : Area laws for the entanglement entropy
Eisert, J., Cramer, M., & Plenio, M. B. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.277 · Cited by 2,873
Orús, R. (2014) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2014.06.013 · Cited by 2,255
Verstraete, F., Murg, V., & Cirac, J. I. (2008) · Advances In Physics · doi:10.1080/14789940801912366 · Cited by 1,841
Self-citationEntanglement entropy and conformal field theory
Calabrese, P., & Cardy, J. (2009) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/50/504005 · Cited by 1,688
“I (n) A:B does not have all the correct properties to be an entanglement measure (see the review by Amico and Fazio in this special issue [8] for a discussion of various entanglement measures), but it has the fundamental property of satisfying the area law [6, 9], even at finite temperature [10].”
BackgroundBlack holes and the butterfly effect
Shenker, S. H., & Stanford, D. (2014) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2014)067 · Cited by 1,533
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolf, M. M., Verstraete, F., Hastings, M. B., & Cirac, J. I.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- University of Vienna (AT)
- Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-02-20
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 070502-070502
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2014461107
- Cited by
- 696
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 11.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC52-06NA2-5396, AC52-06NA25396)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- area law, holographic principle, mutual information, quantum correlations, finite correlation length, lattice model, thermal equilibrium
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review