Cited by 24Spectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications

Erratum: Coherent Multiheterodyne Spectroscopy Using Stabilized Optical Frequency Combs [Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 013902 (2008)]

Coddington, Ian, Swann, William, Newbury, Nathan·2008·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

On page 2, the statement that ''Furthermore, the broadband SNR increases quadratically in time due to the coherent accumulation of signal, . . .''should read ''Furthermore, the broadband power SNR increases linearly in time due to the coherent accumulation of signal, . . ..''

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.101.049901

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coddington, I., Swann, W., & Newbury, N.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2008-07-23
Volume
101
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2082221500
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Spectroscopy and Laser Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Keywords
optical frequency combs, frequency comb stabilization, signal-to-noise ratio, coherent accumulation, broadband spectroscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review