Cited by 376Laser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsAtomic and Molecular PhysicsQuantum optics and atomic interactions

Attosecond Time-Resolved Autoionization of Argon

Open access
Wang, He, Chini, Michael, Chen, Shouyuan, Zhang, Chang-Hua, He, Feng, Cheng, Yan, Wu, Yi, Thumm, Uwe +1 more·2010·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

Autoionization of argon atoms was studied experimentally by transient absorption spectroscopy with isolated attosecond pulses. The peak position, intensity, linewidth, and shape of the 3s3p⁶np ¹P Fano resonance series (26.6-29.2 eV) were modified by intense few-cycle near infrared laser pulses, while the delay between the attosecond pulse and the laser pulse was changed by a few femtoseconds. Numerical simulations revealed that the experimentally observed splitting of the 3s3p⁶4p ¹P line is caused by the coupling between two short-lived highly excited states in the strong laser field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.105.143002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 376

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. S. Gilbertson et al., International Quantum Electronics Conference (IQEC), Baltimore, Maryland May 31, 2009 (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C., 2009).

Authors
Wang, H., Chini, M., Chen, S., Zhang, C.-H., He, F., Cheng, Y., Wu, Y., Thumm, U., & Chang, Z.
Affiliations
  • Kansas State University (US)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • University of Central Florida (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2010-10-01
Volume
105
Issue
14
Pages
143002-143002
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2041539879
Cited by
376
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 23
FWCI
10.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • K-State Research Exchange (Kansas State University) (submittedVersion)
  • Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Molecular Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
autoionization, argon, attosecond pulses, transient absorption spectroscopy, Fano resonance, few-cycle pulses, near-infrared laser, highly excited states, strong-field ionization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review